2022
DOI: 10.3390/ijms24010725
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Silico Identification and In Vitro Evaluation of New ABCG2 Transporter Inhibitors as Potential Anticancer Agents

Abstract: Different molecular mechanisms contribute to the development of multidrug resistance in cancer, including increased drug efflux, enhanced cellular repair mechanisms and alterations of drug metabolism or drug targets. ABCG2 is a member of the ATP-binding cassette superfamily transporters that promotes drug efflux, inducing chemotherapeutic resistance in malignant cells. In this context, the development of selective ABCG2 inhibitors might be a suitable strategy to improve chemotherapy efficacy. Thus, through a m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, compounds 47 and 60 showed a significant increase in-cell mortality when coadministered with paclitaxel 1 nM with a reduction of cell viability from 78.35 ± 1.05% (paclitaxel 1 nM alone) to 32.34 ± 1.15% ( 47 + paclitaxel 1 nM) and 50.74 ± 4.49% ( 60 + paclitaxel 1 nM, Figure A). In order to further investigate this result, we also evaluated the effect of these coadministrations on 3D cellular models, well-established models to mime tumor characteristics and for preclinical chemo-sensitivity studies. , Strong differences in spheroid mortality were already observed in the administration of compounds alone: paclitaxel (41.14 ± 2.01%) and compounds 47 (53.45 ± 8.87%) and 60 (56.85 ± 7.12%) as compared to control (22.10 ± 2.89%). Furthermore, the coadministration of paclitaxel with selected compounds led to a significant increase of cell mortality compared to compounds alone: 47 + paclitaxel induces 80.12 ± 5.32% of cell death, while 60 + paclitaxel results in 83.54 ± 7.79% of spheroids mortality (Figure B,C).…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As a result, compounds 47 and 60 showed a significant increase in-cell mortality when coadministered with paclitaxel 1 nM with a reduction of cell viability from 78.35 ± 1.05% (paclitaxel 1 nM alone) to 32.34 ± 1.15% ( 47 + paclitaxel 1 nM) and 50.74 ± 4.49% ( 60 + paclitaxel 1 nM, Figure A). In order to further investigate this result, we also evaluated the effect of these coadministrations on 3D cellular models, well-established models to mime tumor characteristics and for preclinical chemo-sensitivity studies. , Strong differences in spheroid mortality were already observed in the administration of compounds alone: paclitaxel (41.14 ± 2.01%) and compounds 47 (53.45 ± 8.87%) and 60 (56.85 ± 7.12%) as compared to control (22.10 ± 2.89%). Furthermore, the coadministration of paclitaxel with selected compounds led to a significant increase of cell mortality compared to compounds alone: 47 + paclitaxel induces 80.12 ± 5.32% of cell death, while 60 + paclitaxel results in 83.54 ± 7.79% of spheroids mortality (Figure B,C).…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Synergistic interaction can offer several advantages: first, it allows to reduce host toxicity and side effects, given that drug doses used in combination are typically lower than that of single drugs. Additionally, it can also reduce the development of drug resistance phenomena, such as increased drug efflux ABC-transporter-mediated, enhanced cellular repair mechanisms, and alterations of drug metabolism or drug targets. , …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chemotherapy is a standard method of cancer treatment that relies on cytotoxic drugs for the destruction or inhibition of the growth and metastasis of cancer cells. There has been a considerable effort to discover anticancer agents for cancer chemotherapy [2][3][4][5][6]. However, cancer chemotherapy often adversely affected from the chemoresistance which is the skill of tumor cells to adopt the presence of cytotoxic drugs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, ATP or nucleotide binding to NBD causes conformational changes in such a manner that the substrate molecule is captured in its cavity and released on the other side. (Rees et al, 2009;Vasiliou et al, 2009;Tarling et al, 2013;Alam et al, 2019;Di et al, 2022). Of the 48 classified ABC transporters, the three most widely studied and characterized efflux glycoproteins, namely, P-glycoprotein (also known as Pgp or ABCB1), multidrug resistance protein 1 (also known as MRP1 or ABCC1), and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) (also known as BCRP or ABCG2), have significant roles in causing multidrug resistance in cancer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%