2004
DOI: 10.1126/science.1100636
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Silico Genetics: Identification of a Functional Element Regulating H2 - E α Gene Expression

Abstract: Computational tools can markedly accelerate the rate at which murine genetic models can be analyzed. We developed a computational method for mapping phenotypic traits that vary among inbred strains onto haplotypic blocks. This method correctly predicted the genetic basis for strain-specific differences in several biologically important traits. It was also used to identify an allele-specific functional genomic element regulating H2-Ealpha gene expression. This functional element, which contained the binding sit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
137
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
137
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, associating breedspecific genotypes with ''fixed'' phenotypes in multiple breeds (across-breed mapping) presents a powerful tool for identifying quantitative trait loci (QTL) that may form the genetic basis for the phenotypic diversity observed in dog breeds. Similar approaches have been described using inbred mouse strains (Grupe et al 2001;Liao et al 2004;Pletcher et al 2004;Wang et al 2005), and these have 1 been combined with classical QTL analysis (Park et al 2003;Dipetrillo et al 2004;Wang et al 2004;Cervino et al 2005). However, the number of inbred mouse lines available are far fewer than the number of dog breeds, and the number of phenotypes offered by mice much fewer than what is offered by the nearly 300 breeds of domestic dog.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, associating breedspecific genotypes with ''fixed'' phenotypes in multiple breeds (across-breed mapping) presents a powerful tool for identifying quantitative trait loci (QTL) that may form the genetic basis for the phenotypic diversity observed in dog breeds. Similar approaches have been described using inbred mouse strains (Grupe et al 2001;Liao et al 2004;Pletcher et al 2004;Wang et al 2005), and these have 1 been combined with classical QTL analysis (Park et al 2003;Dipetrillo et al 2004;Wang et al 2004;Cervino et al 2005). However, the number of inbred mouse lines available are far fewer than the number of dog breeds, and the number of phenotypes offered by mice much fewer than what is offered by the nearly 300 breeds of domestic dog.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method can be directly applied to inbred strains of mice. When haplotype data are available, the new method can further be extended to haplotype-based MLISM (Liao et al, 2004;Guo et al, 2006Guo et al, , 2007Liang et al, 2006a, b). When single-nucleotide polymorphism molecular data are available, the new method can be used to improve the precision of QTL mapping and to select the candidate genes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chesler et al (2001) and Darvasi (2001) have questioned the validity of this so-called in silico mapping (ISM) on the basis that it is associated with a relatively high false-positive rate (FPR). Recently, Peltz's group further extended the computational method for mapping phenotypic traits that vary among inbred strains onto haplotypic blocks, known as the haplotype-based ISM (HISM) approach (Liao et al, 2004). This method predicted the genetic basis for strain-specific differences in several biologically important traits of mice (Liao et al, 2004;Guo et al, 2006Guo et al, , 2007Liang et al, 2006a, b), but it only performs a single-locus analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are many new methods for mapping QTL and isolating the specific genes of importance. Inbred strains can be surveyed directly for associations between markers and phenotypes (Grupe et al 2001;Liao et al 2004), although the statistical mapping power of such analyses has been questioned due to the close pedigree relationships among standard inbred strains, leading to large haplotype similarities. Mapping studies are more difficult, but more powerful, in outbred stocks (Mott et al 2000;Flint et al 2005;Valdar et al 2006).…”
Section: Inbred Strainsmentioning
confidence: 99%