2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.imu.2019.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-silico design of peptide receptor for carboxyhemoglobin recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
7
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, for the bioreceptor 2.1, the possible interactions that existed before adding the methylene bridges were lost. This result contradicts that of a previous study [ 18 ], but if it is considered that the substrate size in the study was much larger compared to DA, it could be deduced that DA can only generate a few interactions.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, for the bioreceptor 2.1, the possible interactions that existed before adding the methylene bridges were lost. This result contradicts that of a previous study [ 18 ], but if it is considered that the substrate size in the study was much larger compared to DA, it could be deduced that DA can only generate a few interactions.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…As expected, the results indicated that the affinity of the three bioreceptors for DA was lower than the affinity of DAT for DA, which is −5.2 kcal/mol. As previously reported, these results were expected because the steric hindrance exhibited by a peptide within this design length range is not comparable with that of a target [18].…”
Section: Bioreceptor Codesupporting
confidence: 61%
See 3 more Smart Citations