2020
DOI: 10.1504/ijbra.2020.104852
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In silico deleterious prediction of nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms in Neurexin1 gene for mental disorders

Abstract: Neurexin1 (NRXN1) gene is playing an important role in synaptic formation, plasticity and maturity. Studies have reported non-synonymous SNPs in NRXN1 in patient with mental disorders. The current work is applying computational tools on recoded NRXN1 SNPs in mental disorder patients. The aim of the work is to identify deleterious SNPs, determine damaged protein features (function, stability) and recognise potential protein regions for future research. The effect on protein function is predicted by PROVEAN, SIF… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We applied the following common a priori filtering criteria in workflow 1 and 2: (i) classified as 'exonic', 'splicing', or 'exonic;splicing'; (ii) not classified as synonymous; (iii) not located within a segmentally duplicated region; (iv) a Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion (CADD) Phred score ≥ 20; (v) a positive Genomic Evolutionary Rate Profiling (GERP) score; (vi) shared by at least two family members affected on the TEGI; (vii) multiple damaging scores according to five in silico programs, including SIFT (Sorting Intolerant from Tolerant), PolyPhen-2 (Polymorphism Phenotyping v2), Mutation Assessor, PROVEAN (Protein Variation Effect Analyzer), and MutationTaster2 [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44]. Articles commonly assess and present multiple in silico prediction scores to provide context for the significance of the identified variants [19,36,[44][45][46][47]. Finally, we applied family-specific criteria (detailed in Tables S4 and S5).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We applied the following common a priori filtering criteria in workflow 1 and 2: (i) classified as 'exonic', 'splicing', or 'exonic;splicing'; (ii) not classified as synonymous; (iii) not located within a segmentally duplicated region; (iv) a Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion (CADD) Phred score ≥ 20; (v) a positive Genomic Evolutionary Rate Profiling (GERP) score; (vi) shared by at least two family members affected on the TEGI; (vii) multiple damaging scores according to five in silico programs, including SIFT (Sorting Intolerant from Tolerant), PolyPhen-2 (Polymorphism Phenotyping v2), Mutation Assessor, PROVEAN (Protein Variation Effect Analyzer), and MutationTaster2 [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44]. Articles commonly assess and present multiple in silico prediction scores to provide context for the significance of the identified variants [19,36,[44][45][46][47]. Finally, we applied family-specific criteria (detailed in Tables S4 and S5).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a previous work (Hendam et al 2020 ), a dataset consists of 38 nsSNPs in Neurexin1α and β forms that have been collected from different studies. Two groups of computational tools for predicting the effects of nsSNPs on protein have been applied.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%