2020
DOI: 10.11113/jt.v82.13635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Silico Analysis and Functional Characterization of Fhub, a Component of Erwinia Mallotivora Ferric Hydroxamate Uptake System

Abstract: Iron is a critical element for bacterial growth as most pathogenic bacteria relies on their host for iron supply. However, iron sources are bounded to the host iron binding protein and specific iron acquisition mechanism is required to chelate and transport the iron to the bacteria. Ferric hydroxamate uptake system or fhu is one of the transport systems that import iron in the form of ferric hydroxamate/ ferrichrome from the extracellular environment into the bacterial cytosol. In this present study, a detaile… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To investigate the involvement of hrpL in E. mallotivora pathogenicity, the Δ Em hrpL strain was used to artificially inoculate four-month-old papaya plants and the resulting disease severity was compared against severity produced by wild type E. mallotivora (positive control). The progression of dieback disease severity (averaged) on papaya plants caused by Δ Em hrpL vs. wild type strain is shown in Table 4 and it was based on the 0–5 papaya dieback disease severity score [ 21 ]. Upon infection with the Δ Em hrpL strain, the papaya plants manifested zero symptoms during 3–12 DPI.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To investigate the involvement of hrpL in E. mallotivora pathogenicity, the Δ Em hrpL strain was used to artificially inoculate four-month-old papaya plants and the resulting disease severity was compared against severity produced by wild type E. mallotivora (positive control). The progression of dieback disease severity (averaged) on papaya plants caused by Δ Em hrpL vs. wild type strain is shown in Table 4 and it was based on the 0–5 papaya dieback disease severity score [ 21 ]. Upon infection with the Δ Em hrpL strain, the papaya plants manifested zero symptoms during 3–12 DPI.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disease severity was scored following the study conducted by Juri et al [ 21 ]. Disease severity scoring was evaluated using a 5-stage scale as follows: 0—symptomless; 1—leaf vein blackening; 2—leaf vein blackening + slight wilting; 3—leaf stalk wilting; 4—stem blackening; 5—plant death.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…About four years after the identification of the pathogen, the draft genome sequence of E. mallotivora was published and this has initiated more research [ 4 ]. Wee et al [ 14 ], Hamid et al [ 15 ], Juri et al [ 16 , 17 ], Abu-Bakar et al [ 18 ], Abu Bakar et al [ 19 ], and Tamizi et al [ 20 ] have conducted in-depth studies to understand the host–pathogen interactions and pathogenicity of E. mallotivora at the molecular level, while Noor Shahida et al [ 6 ] described the infection from a physiological perspective. The use of conventional breeding and genetic engineering to develop new papaya lines that would be resistant to E. mallotivora is still in the research pipelines [ 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%