In search of the roots of HRM in the Chinese workplace

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to trace back the roots of US-driven “Human Resource Management” (HRM) school of thought which now become widely institutionalized in China, up to the present day. Design/methodology/approach It looks at the diffusion of management knowledge over the period to Chinese business, which involved in turn scientific management (SM), human relations (HR) and HRM, respectively, from the interwar years onwards, by using a bibliometric analysis of Chinese language sources, searching a number of databases now available. Findings The authors scanned the international, as well as Chinese, literature to support a conjecture of a HR route towards China and how it morphed into HRM and went on to conclude that there was by the end of the year 2015 still a significant output of academic publications with references to both HR and HRM, respectively, but that we must be cautious in asserting a firm conclusion. Originality/value This paper traces back the roots of Chinese HRM back to the US-driven HR school of thought.

Toward a “Meaningful Self” at the Workplace: Multinational Evidence From Asia, Europe, and North America

“…Apart from that, current management thinking provides more specific theoretical concepts which are "meaning-related" and have been successfully applied to organizations and workplaces. From a historical perspective, we argue that the Hawthorne experiments had built the fundament for a psychologically oriented "mind-over-matter" approach to Human Resource Management (HRM) thinking (see Busse, Warner, & Zhao, 2016). While Taylor is said to have focused on physical control over workforces through his scientific management approach, Mayo's Human Relations movement marks the beginning of the current ideology wave (Barley & Kunda, 1992), where psychological stimuli outweigh their physical counterparts.…”

The ‘iron rice‐bowl’ regime revisited: whither human resource management in Chinese universities?

“…In recent decades, research on Chinese human resource management (HRM) has attracted considerable scholarly attention (e.g. Busse, Warner and Zhao ; Chen, Su and Zeng ; Zhu, Zhang and Shen ), and the ways of managing people in China have been a ‘hot topic’. Although scholars still struggle to understand the paradoxes of Chinese HRM and there is no consensus about its nature (Warner ; Zheng ), they tend to argue that market‐oriented reform has significantly changed the way people are managed there.…”