“…In order for APT to evolve into an accepted metrology for the life sciences, there are a number challenges to overcome (Panitz, 2005; Braet et al , 2006; Heeren et al , 2006): (1) specimen preparation techniques need to be developed to fashion or deposit the materials of interest into shapes suitable for APT and/or local‐electrode APT (Larson & Kelly, 2006) analysis, (2) controlled field evaporation of material from those specimens needs to be demonstrated, (3) specimen stability (both minimization of potential surface diffusion and bulk stability) under high‐field conditions needs to be verified to ensure an ability to reconstruct static spatial information, (4) fragmentation variability needs to be understood to support compatibility with available reconstruction methods and finally (5) correlation with currently accepted analytical methods must be established to overcome discipline‐specific barriers preventing large‐scale adoption by practitioners in the field. Many of these challenges are remnants of relevant work done in field‐electron emission and field‐ion microscopies (Müller, 1950; Abbott, 1965; Müller & Rendulic, 1967; Machlin et al , 1975; Panitz & Giaver, 1981; Panitz, 1982a, b).…”