2006
DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.42.6.1026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In search of shared and nonshared environmental factors in security of attachment: A behavior-genetic study of the association between sensitivity and attachment security.

Abstract: The current article presents results from a twin study of genetic and environmental components of maternal sensitivity and infant attachment and their association. The sample consisted of 136 twin pairs from 2 sites: Leiden, the Netherlands, and London, UK. Maternal sensitivity was assessed in the home at 9-10 months, and infant attachment security was observed in the laboratory at 12 months. The study yielded little evidence that genetic factors are involved in variations between twins in maternal sensitivity… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
83
1
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
7
83
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of variation in genetic relatedness within sibling pairs (e.g., MZ or DZ twins, biologically related siblings) and between sibling pairs and the parent generation limit our conclusions regarding possible genetic influences on sources of environmental influence (e.g., shared, nonshared) (Reiss et al, 1994;Turkheimer & Waldron, 2000). The untested possibility remains that genetic differences between siblings influenced or were differentially influenced by qualities of the parent -child relationship (e.g., parental sensitivity) and/or impacted potential intervening influences on attachment in adulthood (e.g., romantic relationships) (Fearon, van IJzendoorn, Fonagy, Bakermans-Kranenburg, Schuengel, & Bokhorst, 2006;Torgerson, Grova, & Sommerstad, 2007). Unfortunately, our sample size and study design preclude examination of these processes with our data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The lack of variation in genetic relatedness within sibling pairs (e.g., MZ or DZ twins, biologically related siblings) and between sibling pairs and the parent generation limit our conclusions regarding possible genetic influences on sources of environmental influence (e.g., shared, nonshared) (Reiss et al, 1994;Turkheimer & Waldron, 2000). The untested possibility remains that genetic differences between siblings influenced or were differentially influenced by qualities of the parent -child relationship (e.g., parental sensitivity) and/or impacted potential intervening influences on attachment in adulthood (e.g., romantic relationships) (Fearon, van IJzendoorn, Fonagy, Bakermans-Kranenburg, Schuengel, & Bokhorst, 2006;Torgerson, Grova, & Sommerstad, 2007). Unfortunately, our sample size and study design preclude examination of these processes with our data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Moreover, approximately one-third of the variance in psychopathic tendencies in childhood are attributable to nonshared environmental influences (Viding et al, 2005). Mentalization therefore, with its ties to attachment (Fonagy, Redfern, & Charman, 1997;Fonagy, Steele, Steele, & Holder, 1997;Hill, et al, 2008), largely mediated by shared and nonshared environmental factors 13 (Fearon, et al, 2006;Roisman & Fraley, 2008), may add to the understanding of etiological factors in psychopathy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in contrast to the study by van IJzendoorn et al (2000) based on the data of 2014 normal children of 15 US samples assessed using the Strange Situation Procedure reporting a significant 62% concordance rate between infant siblings which was also significantly higher than expected by chance (52%). A 60% concordance rate, but not significant in every case, was also found in other studies with younger sibling pairs and twins measured in the Strange Situation Procedure (Bokhorst et al, 2003;Fearon et al, 2006;O'Connor & Croft, 2001;Teti & Ablard, 1989;Ward et al, 1988). However, methodological differences between the studies make it difficult to compare the concordance rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%