2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpp.2016.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In search of consensus: Terminology for entheseal changes (EC)

Abstract: This article presents a consensus terminology for entheseal changes that was developed in English by an international team of scholars and then translated into French, Italian, Portuguese, Spanish and German. Use of a standard, neutral terminology to describe entheseal morphology will reduce misunderstandings between researchers, improve the reliability of comparisons between studies, and eliminate unwarranted etiological assumptions inherent in some of the descriptive terms presently used in the literature.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
40
0
10

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
40
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Various terms have been used to describe the changes to bones that occur at sites of muscle attachment, including enthesopathies (Dutour, 1986;Hawkey, 1998); muscle crests (Angel, Kelley, Parrington, & Pinter, 1987); muscle markings (Robb, 1998); musculoskeletal stress markers (Hawkey & Merbs, 1995); and markers of occupational stress (Kennedy, 1998). However, many of these osteological alterations have multifactorial etiologies, and therefore, a more generic and neutral term "entheseal changes" (ECs) has been adopted (Jurmain & Villotte, 2010;Villotte et al, 2016;Villotte & Knüsel, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Various terms have been used to describe the changes to bones that occur at sites of muscle attachment, including enthesopathies (Dutour, 1986;Hawkey, 1998); muscle crests (Angel, Kelley, Parrington, & Pinter, 1987); muscle markings (Robb, 1998); musculoskeletal stress markers (Hawkey & Merbs, 1995); and markers of occupational stress (Kennedy, 1998). However, many of these osteological alterations have multifactorial etiologies, and therefore, a more generic and neutral term "entheseal changes" (ECs) has been adopted (Jurmain & Villotte, 2010;Villotte et al, 2016;Villotte & Knüsel, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Entheses are complex physiological structures that have been classified according to their anatomy and histology into two types: fibrocartilaginous and fibrous (Benjamin et al, 2002;Benjamin & Ralphs, 2001;Henderson, Mariotti, Pany-Kucera, Villotte, & Wilczak, 2013;Jimenéz-Brobeil, Roca, & Laffranchi, 2011;Jurmain & Villotte, 2010;Villotte et al, 2016). Fibrocartilaginous entheses consist of various histological structures, including fibrous connective tissue, calcified fibrocartilage, uncalcified fibrocartilage, and bone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method is only defined for fibrocartilaginous entheses because, unlike fibrous entheses, these have a ‘normal’ baseline appearance devoid of any roughness, pores or other alterations (Henderson et al, ). The features recorded by the method encompass the spectrum of changes seen at fibrocartilaginous entheses from new bone formation, erosions, textural change, porosity (both fine porosity and macroporosity) and cavitations (Henderson et al, , ; Villotte et al, ). Due to the higher fibrous content at the acute attachment of the fibres to the bone, this zone (zone 1) is recorded separately from the remaining bone surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the primary anatomical areas examined have been the entheses, that is, the sites where muscles, tendons or ligaments attach on the bones (e.g. Hawkey & Merbs, 1995;Nagy, 1999;Weiss, 2003Weiss, , 2015Eshed et al, 2004;Molnar, 2008;Villotte et al, 2010Villotte et al, , 2016Havelková et al, 2011;Yonemoto, 2016). The relationship between activity patterns and entheseal changes (ECs) relies on biomechanical and clinical information, which supports that bone reacts to mechanical stress by increasing blood flow in the area under loading, which in turn results in elevated bone growth, hence visible ECs (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sites of muscle attachments are of particular interest as the mechanical loads are concentrated providing detail that can be interpreted in terms of an organism's function, phylogenetic relationships, lifeways, and the intrinsic biological adaptive capacity of the associated tissues (Lieberman, 1997;Henderson and Alves Cardoso, 2013;Villotte and Knüsel, 2013;Foster et al, 2014;Villotte et al, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%