2018
DOI: 10.24251/hicss.2018.304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Search for Holistic ICT4D Research: A Systematic Literature Review

Abstract: The technologist vs. contextualist debate has divided Information and Communications Technology for Development (ICT4D) research. Today, the field is disconnected across three distinct research streams, which should be consolidated into a more holistic discourse. However, this endeavor remained unfeasible to date, because the similarities and differences of these ICT4D streams had not been clearly conceptualized. Our present work addresses this gap in knowledge through a systematic review of extant ICT4D resea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same remark has been made by Heeks, Thapa, and Wall (2018) from a different point of view, bemoaning the paucity of deeper/thicker reflection in ICT4D. Fairly obviously, Ramadani, Kurnia, and Breidbach (2018) on their part bewailed the top-down approach crippling existing criticism seen in ICT4D. Discourse analysis is a tool noted for its criticism against taken-for-granted social practices, actions, relations, and representations.…”
Section: Advertisement Of Icts In Lieu Of People's Developmentmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The same remark has been made by Heeks, Thapa, and Wall (2018) from a different point of view, bemoaning the paucity of deeper/thicker reflection in ICT4D. Fairly obviously, Ramadani, Kurnia, and Breidbach (2018) on their part bewailed the top-down approach crippling existing criticism seen in ICT4D. Discourse analysis is a tool noted for its criticism against taken-for-granted social practices, actions, relations, and representations.…”
Section: Advertisement Of Icts In Lieu Of People's Developmentmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…This was a specific response to lack of knowledge around digital enterprise and embeddedness in development contexts. It was also a response to the more general call for more and more-conceptualized work on digital and embeddedness in international development (Avgerou, 2008;Ramadani et al, 2018). We used the TEF to address a research question that looked at three debated issues: extent, nature and impact of embeddedness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nature of embeddedness is understood mainly in terms of the difference in institutions, but partly in terms of global South countries being at the periphery of global networks of technology, knowledge, and other resources. Overall, though, the limited nature of explicit engagement with embeddedness has led to calls for more research on ICTs and embeddedness in contexts of development; particularly research that better-theorizes embeddedness (Avgerou, 2008;Ramadani et al, 2018).…”
Section: Digital Enterprise Embeddedness and Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The challenge we have with the linear causality is that it does not conform to the social-embedded demand as argued by Ramadani et al (2018) which is important in ICT4D. Social-embeddedness requires comprehension "of the social situation where the technology takes place" (Ramadani et al, 2018(Ramadani et al, , p. 2425.…”
Section: Affordance Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The challenge we have with the linear causality is that it does not conform to the social-embedded demand as argued by Ramadani et al (2018) which is important in ICT4D. Social-embeddedness requires comprehension "of the social situation where the technology takes place" (Ramadani et al, 2018(Ramadani et al, , p. 2425. Therefore, we subscribe to the relational view of affordance as we engage with the research as relativists, focusing on the presence of novice researchers and understanding how their interactions with the technology and systems may affect the research collaborations.…”
Section: Affordance Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%