2019
DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2019-0060-le
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Reply to “Malignant Mesothelioma and Its Nonasbestos Causes”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Malignant mesothelioma is strongly associated with exposure to asbestos (8-11). Other etiological factors are genetic predisposition (12-14), radiation exposure, and viral infection that alone or together with asbestos exposure can cause malignant mesotheliomas (15,16).Mesotheliomas carry acquired genetic aberrations (17). Cytogenetic analysis of 131 tumors has shown that most mesotheliomas have complex karyotypes (18).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Malignant mesothelioma is strongly associated with exposure to asbestos (8-11). Other etiological factors are genetic predisposition (12-14), radiation exposure, and viral infection that alone or together with asbestos exposure can cause malignant mesotheliomas (15,16).Mesotheliomas carry acquired genetic aberrations (17). Cytogenetic analysis of 131 tumors has shown that most mesotheliomas have complex karyotypes (18).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Malignant mesothelioma is strongly associated with exposure to asbestos (8-11). Other etiological factors are genetic predisposition (12-14), radiation exposure, and viral infection that alone or together with asbestos exposure can cause malignant mesotheliomas (15,16).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, 70-90% of MPM cases in North America and Europe are attributed to asbestos exposure. Although most cases are reported in men, there is a higher proportion of women with MPM in Europe who are attributed to asbestos exposure [35]. In an analysis reported by Teta et al [36], wherein they reviewed National Cancer Institute's Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results registry data from 1973 to 2002, mesothelioma was rare in younger age groups, and stable and similar for both sexes, but the incidence was still higher in men older than 60 years [36].…”
Section: Malignant Mesotheliomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some parts of the world, there have been reports of nonoccupational exposure from naturally occurring asbestos fibre in the soil. Although some small epidemiologic studies attempt to clear and report an increasing number of cases in these regions, a common confounding factor is that a member of the household carries an occupational risk [35]. In one meta-analysis of cases of MPM in nonoccupational exposures, they found a strong correlation between the incidence of MPM and neighbourhood or household exposure.…”
Section: Malignant Mesotheliomamentioning
confidence: 99%