1977
DOI: 10.1007/bf00280179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In�quations d'evolution paraboliques avec convexes d�pendant du temps. Applications aux in�quations quasi-variationnelles d'evolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
65
0
2

Year Published

1980
1980
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
65
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As far as the existence of a solution of the quasi-variational evolution problem is concerned, we can work in a much larger class of {ϕ t (v; ·)} than that of this paper; see [2] and also [6,9]. Actually our class of {ϕ t (v; ·)} treated in this paper is a special case of that in [2].…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…As far as the existence of a solution of the quasi-variational evolution problem is concerned, we can work in a much larger class of {ϕ t (v; ·)} than that of this paper; see [2] and also [6,9]. Actually our class of {ϕ t (v; ·)} treated in this paper is a special case of that in [2].…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The stationary cases have been dealt with in many papers, for instance, [2,5,10,13,14], but there are not so many papers dealing with the time-evolution problems, because it is not expected for solutions to have much regularity in time. We recall some papers [11,15,16] for time evolution quasi-variational inequalities. In papers [11,16], the so-called monotonicity property of the mapping v → φ s (v; ·) is used as one of key tools in their treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recall some papers [11,15,16] for time evolution quasi-variational inequalities. In papers [11,16], the so-called monotonicity property of the mapping v → φ s (v; ·) is used as one of key tools in their treatment. However, the monotonicity property is too restrictive in many important applications, as examples of section 5 suggest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We know from Remark 5.15 that if there is v ∈ W such that h 1 ≤ v ≤ h 2 a.e., then a unique solution of OP(ϕ, f, h 1 , h 2 ) is a weak solution of VI(ϕ, f, h 1 , h 2 ), but in general, the latter problem may have many other solutions (see [24] for relevant examples). To ensure uniqueness of solutions of variational inequalities additional regularity conditions on the data are needed.…”
Section: Remark 517mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a formulation of a solution of the obstacle problem is very useful because instead of variational inequalities we consider variational equalities which provide an additional information on the solution, and what is more important, it guarantees uniqueness of solutions (in the theory of variational inequalities solutions of obstacle problems with timedependent barriers are in general not unique, see e.g. [24]). …”
Section: Whereũ(t) Is a Quasi-continuous Version Of U(t) μ(T) = μ R mentioning
confidence: 99%