The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
Qualitative Research Methods in Mental Health and Psychotherapy 2011
DOI: 10.1002/9781119973249.ch16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Pursuit of Quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
125
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
125
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All included studies were qualitative, so quality was assessed using a framework for assessing qualitative research evidence, covering the different stages and processes within qualitative enquiry and the contribution, defensibility, rigour and credibility of the study [12]. Two raters (authors CL and ML) double-rated the quality of all the included studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All included studies were qualitative, so quality was assessed using a framework for assessing qualitative research evidence, covering the different stages and processes within qualitative enquiry and the contribution, defensibility, rigour and credibility of the study [12]. Two raters (authors CL and ML) double-rated the quality of all the included studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complete coding frame and sample comparison were reviewed by SB, JK and IJH to confirm the analysis and interpretation. To maximise analytical rigour, a selection of the interviews was reviewed by a second researcher (JK), and consensus achieved 18. Excerpts from the interview transcripts are presented below, to illustrate themes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, few papers [5][6][7] deal with the implementation impact of QMS in a research laboratory. Spencer et al [5] underline the advantages in Quality assessment of qualitative research for evaluations of research programmes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spencer et al [5] underline the advantages in Quality assessment of qualitative research for evaluations of research programmes. The quality of scientific research is often uneven and lacking in credibility, making it difficult to make a confident, concrete assertion or prediction regarding evidence for improving practice or consumer outcomes [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%