2007
DOI: 10.1193/1.2429564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-Plane Shake-Table Testing of GFRP-Strengthened Concrete Masonry Walls

Abstract: In-plane shake-table tests were performed on eight full-scale unreinforced concrete block walls. Three of the walls were left as plain unreinforced masonry and five were strengthened using glass-fiber-reinforced plastic (GFRP) strips in four different configurations. All walls were first subjected to design-level earthquake records to determine the improvement obtained from the addition of the GFRP. The walls were then subjected to extreme-level earthquake records to examine the ultimate failure modes and the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results showed two failure modes depending on the height-to-thickness ratio of the walls and the ground motion intensity: (1) overturning of the wall as a rigid body and (2) partial collapse of upper part of the wall. More recently, experimental out-of-plane bending studies have been focused on unreinforced masonry (URM) walls [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] and few on rammed earth walls, 28,29 leaving adobe walls aside. With a numerical approach, Tarque et al 11 developed fragility curves for adobe buildings in Peru, adopting the displacement-based analytical models proposed by Doherty et al 30 and Griffith et al 31,32 for the out-of-plane response of URM walls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results showed two failure modes depending on the height-to-thickness ratio of the walls and the ground motion intensity: (1) overturning of the wall as a rigid body and (2) partial collapse of upper part of the wall. More recently, experimental out-of-plane bending studies have been focused on unreinforced masonry (URM) walls [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] and few on rammed earth walls, 28,29 leaving adobe walls aside. With a numerical approach, Tarque et al 11 developed fragility curves for adobe buildings in Peru, adopting the displacement-based analytical models proposed by Doherty et al 30 and Griffith et al 31,32 for the out-of-plane response of URM walls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One remedial measure is to reinforce the brick construction using stiffeners composed of steel reinforced concrete grout or fibre reinforced polymer sheets. This could considerably improve the strength of the construction against earthquake loading (1,15,16). However, the problem lies on economical aspect.…”
Section: Structural Advantages Of Proposed Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FRP strengthening improved the resistance to cracking and therefore improved the dynamic lateral resistance of the walls. Turek et al [2007] examined the dynamic response of masonry walls made of high strength concrete blocks. The results of this experimental study further strengthen the observation that the response is strongly affected by the strength ratio dictated by the high strength masonry units and the low strength mortar joints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%