2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpcs.2007.07.083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-plane magnetic anisotropies in Ni/FeMn and Ni90Fe10/FeMn exchange biased bilayers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar noncollinear configuration has already been used to model recent experimental observations in exchange-bias systems. [22][23][24][25] In our case, this is unambiguously deduced from the angular dependence of in-plane angle-resolved hysteresis loops, their asymmetry, and a fit to a modified Stoner-Wohlfarth ͑SW͒ model. Additional numerical simulations show that the new anisotropy naturally arises from the inevitable spin frustration at the atomically rough FM/AFM interface, which becomes important for vanishing FM anisotropy.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A similar noncollinear configuration has already been used to model recent experimental observations in exchange-bias systems. [22][23][24][25] In our case, this is unambiguously deduced from the angular dependence of in-plane angle-resolved hysteresis loops, their asymmetry, and a fit to a modified Stoner-Wohlfarth ͑SW͒ model. Additional numerical simulations show that the new anisotropy naturally arises from the inevitable spin frustration at the atomically rough FM/AFM interface, which becomes important for vanishing FM anisotropy.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…25,28,29,35,36 For some systems, rounded transitions in M ʈ and larger M Ќ values are found in the descending branch, 20,21,[25][26][27][28][34][35][36] where the field is applied parallel to the exchange-bias direction, while other systems display the opposite behavior. [21][22][23][24][25][29][30][31][32][33] Our results indicate that this discrepancy is related to the difference between a collinear and a noncollinear anisotropy case. Moreover, the nature of the anisotropy can be unambiguously deduced from the angular dependence of the hysteresis loops.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In general, the interfacial exchange coupling effects depend on the strength of the anisotropies 5 as well as their relative orientation, 6 exhibiting a complex phase diagram of different reversal modes. 5,6,[11][12][13][14][15] In fact, the relative orientation between the intrinsic FM anisotropy and the induced interfacial unidirectional anisotropy can be controlled by different FC procedures, varying both strength, 7,8 FC angle, 6,9,10 and/or interfacial magnetic frustration. 14,15 In this letter we present a detailed study on the magnetization reversal of FM/AFM systems with a noncollinear uniaxial, K U , and unidirectional, K E , anisotropy configuration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%