2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.11.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-plane and through-thickness properties, failure modes, damage and delamination in 3D woven carbon fibre composites subjected to impact loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
75
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
75
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The application of XCT to characterize processing defects and damage micromechanisms in 2D composites is relatively new [10][11][12][13][14] and it has demonstrated its potential to ascertain the beneficial effect of glass fiber hybridization on the energy absorption capability of the 2D woven carbon fiber/epoxy laminates [15]. Moreover, XCT was recently applied to 3D composites [16,17] and, in particular, Gerlach et al [17] used a combination of optical 3D microscopy, ultrasound and low resolution XCT to find out the influence of the z-yarn volume fraction in the delamination resistance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of XCT to characterize processing defects and damage micromechanisms in 2D composites is relatively new [10][11][12][13][14] and it has demonstrated its potential to ascertain the beneficial effect of glass fiber hybridization on the energy absorption capability of the 2D woven carbon fiber/epoxy laminates [15]. Moreover, XCT was recently applied to 3D composites [16,17] and, in particular, Gerlach et al [17] used a combination of optical 3D microscopy, ultrasound and low resolution XCT to find out the influence of the z-yarn volume fraction in the delamination resistance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, except for Refs. [8,11,12,[26][27][28], their dynamic through-thickness stress-strain behavior has not been well investigated. This is because the through-thickness properties of composite materials are typically lower than their in-plane ones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is required to characterize the dynamic behavior of composite materials. To date, the in-plane compressive [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12], tensile [13][14][15][16][17][18] and interlaminar shear [19][20][21][22][23][24] properties of composite materials under dynamic loading have been determined with the conventional [25] or modified split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB). Nevertheless, except for Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various mounting method have been used for flat specimens: adhesively bonded end caps [3], form-fit grips [5], bolted (dowel-pin) [4] specimen into bars and clamping the specimen. Clamping can be based on the inertia of the clamps at dynamic experiments or based on mechanical force and friction.…”
Section: Specimen Mountingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative approach is to adhesively bond a e-mail: noah.ledford@emi.fraunhofer.de b e-mail: hanna.paul@emi.fraunhofer.de c e-mail: georg.ganzenmueller@emi.fraunhofer.de d e-mail: michael.may@emi.fraunhofer.de e e-mail: M.Hoefemann@sz.szmf.de f e-mail: M.Otto@sz.szmf.de g e-mail: nikica.petrinic@emi.fraunhofer.de threaded metalic endcaps on both ends of the specimen and subsequently screw the specimen and the endcaps into the bars. If the adhesion between end caps and specimen is not sufficient, additional clamping mechanisms can be used [3]. Another way is to use specimens with holes and screws to fix them in the bar [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%