1998
DOI: 10.1118/1.598352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In‐phantom dosimetry and spectrometry of photoneutrons from an 18 MV linear accelerator

Abstract: A combination of three superheated drop detectors with different neutron energy responses was developed to evaluate dose-equivalent and energy distributions of photoneutrons in a phantom irradiated by radiotherapy high-energy x-ray beams. One of the three detectors measures the total neutron dose equivalent and the other two measure the contributions from fast neutrons above 1 and 5.5 MeV, respectively. In order to test the new method, the neutron field produced by the 10 cm X 10 cm x-ray beam of an 18 MV radi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
23
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…15 compares experimental measurements of H, made with bubble detectors and detectors based on the CR-39 polymer by [21] and [8,9] [21] in surface are similar to the results of the calculations for the Varian Clinac of 15 MV in this work; but with increasing depth, these experimental results show much higher values than those obtained by [8,9], which are more consistent with Monte Carlo calculations performed in this work, especially for 15 MV. This is the general situation for all employees measurement systems for neutrons, without having to date, the ideal detector that can respond at any desired energy range.…”
Section: Comparison Of Simulations and Experimental Measurementssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…15 compares experimental measurements of H, made with bubble detectors and detectors based on the CR-39 polymer by [21] and [8,9] [21] in surface are similar to the results of the calculations for the Varian Clinac of 15 MV in this work; but with increasing depth, these experimental results show much higher values than those obtained by [8,9], which are more consistent with Monte Carlo calculations performed in this work, especially for 15 MV. This is the general situation for all employees measurement systems for neutrons, without having to date, the ideal detector that can respond at any desired energy range.…”
Section: Comparison Of Simulations and Experimental Measurementssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Neutron fluence and spectra in water have been measured using bubble detectors and superheated drop detectors [8,9,21], 197 Au-based Bonner spheres [12] and thermoluminescent dosemeters [11,35,40]. [10] measured the neutron fluence at the patient plane for various linacs using gold-foil activation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a linac with photon energy higher than 10 MV is used, neutrons are produced by photons interacting with high-Z material located in the linac head (primary collimators, jaws, flattening filter) [25][26] [27] and any other material surrounding the beam. Neutrons affect the silicon detector response differently than photons, by producing different types of radiation damage, such as displacing of silicon atoms from the crystal lattice and cluster defects [1] [27] [28]. According to Howell et al, the model and linac manufacturer does not play a role in changing the spectrum and intensity of photo-neutrons [29].…”
Section: G Radiation Damagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Howell et al, the model and linac manufacturer does not play a role in changing the spectrum and intensity of photo-neutrons [29]. Linacs with energy higher than 10 MV generate primary neutrons with average kinetic energy ranging between 1 and 2 MeV [30] [31], with an equivalent dose of 4.5 mSv·Gy -1 of photon dose delivered at surface of a solid water phantom [28]. The effect of photo-neutron radiation was investigated using an 18 MV medical Clinac (Varian, USA) at St. George Cancer Centre (Sydney, Australia).…”
Section: G Radiation Damagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for measurement under the treatment beam, the primary photon beam is predominantly too intense to identify a secondary neutron in a humanoid phantom because the high dose transfer by the photon masks any signals from secondary neutrons in conventional electronic detectors. Passive-type dosimeters such as the thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) [3], activation foil [31], bubble detector [32], and plastic nuclear track detector (PNTD) [6,33,34] have been utilized for this application. For in-field neutron measurement, TLD and activation foil are also sensitive to photons; therefore, it is difficult to discriminate between photons and neutrons, whereas the bubble detector and PNTD are considered more suitable detectors because they are insensitive to photons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%