2017
DOI: 10.21476/pp.2017.31161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Our Hands: An Ethics of Gestural Response-ability. Rebecca Schneider in conversation with Lucia Ruprecht

Abstract: The following conversation aims to trace the role of gesture and gestural thinking in Rebecca Schneider's work, and to tease out the specific gestural ethics which arises in her writings. In particular, Schneider thinks about the politics of citation and reiteration for an ethics of call and response that emerges in the gesture of the hail. Both predicated upon a fundamentally ethical relationality and susceptible to ideological investment, the hail epitomizes the operations of the "both/and"-a logic of conjun… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite digital media’s obsession with newness, machine learning is largely about engagement with, and the extraction of value from, historical artefacts. According to Schneider (2018), the register of remains opens up to a response that ‘weaves past and future in intervallic resonance’ (p. 90) and creates a foundation for a ‘response-ability’ (Schneider and Ruprecht, 2017), in the sense both of calling ‘the past to appear for account’ and of being called by ‘the past to respond with account’ (p. 90). While seemingly straightforward, such an engagement often turns out to be complex, partly because ‘archives represent scenes of unbearable historical weight’ (Okwui, 2008) and partly because the methods by which we encounter these traces risk reproducing, in addition to subverting, the exposure of vulnerable archival subjects (Sutherland, 2017).…”
Section: Accounting For Data Set Harms: Deletions and Remainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite digital media’s obsession with newness, machine learning is largely about engagement with, and the extraction of value from, historical artefacts. According to Schneider (2018), the register of remains opens up to a response that ‘weaves past and future in intervallic resonance’ (p. 90) and creates a foundation for a ‘response-ability’ (Schneider and Ruprecht, 2017), in the sense both of calling ‘the past to appear for account’ and of being called by ‘the past to respond with account’ (p. 90). While seemingly straightforward, such an engagement often turns out to be complex, partly because ‘archives represent scenes of unbearable historical weight’ (Okwui, 2008) and partly because the methods by which we encounter these traces risk reproducing, in addition to subverting, the exposure of vulnerable archival subjects (Sutherland, 2017).…”
Section: Accounting For Data Set Harms: Deletions and Remainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 17. Leiris’s (1955) research resulted in Contacts de civilisations en Martinique et Guadeloupe . On his friendship with Césaire see Véron (2021). Leiris (1950) “L’Ethnographe devant le colonialisme” was originally published in Les Temps modernes in 1950.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%