2010
DOI: 10.1117/1.3482165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-orbit measurements of spacecraft microvibrations for satellite laser communication links

Abstract: Angular microvibrations of platform jitter on the optical interorbit communications engineering test satellite are measured in space during ground-to-satellite laser communication links. The microaccelerations are measured by the onboard accelerometers at a sampling rate of 2048 Hz. The angular microvibrations are estimated from the measured microaccelerations using the tracking characteristics of the laser communications terminal and the conversion factor on the basis of microvibration data obtained from grou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the probability density function of the received optical power, due to only pointing errors, is given by [24] ( ) = −1 , 0 ≤ ≤ 1, 0 < < ∞. (12.4) where the parameter = 0 2 /(4 2 ) characterizes the random micro-vibrations of the user terminal; 0 being the laser bean radius at the transmitter, and = [∫ 2 ( ) ] 1/2 is the root-mean-square (RMS) of the random jitter [25]. To complete the model, a power spectral density (PSD) of the user terminal vibrations must be assumed, in order to take into account the temporal behavior of the transmitting telescope pointing errors.…”
Section: Pointing Errors and Micro-vibrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the probability density function of the received optical power, due to only pointing errors, is given by [24] ( ) = −1 , 0 ≤ ≤ 1, 0 < < ∞. (12.4) where the parameter = 0 2 /(4 2 ) characterizes the random micro-vibrations of the user terminal; 0 being the laser bean radius at the transmitter, and = [∫ 2 ( ) ] 1/2 is the root-mean-square (RMS) of the random jitter [25]. To complete the model, a power spectral density (PSD) of the user terminal vibrations must be assumed, in order to take into account the temporal behavior of the transmitting telescope pointing errors.…”
Section: Pointing Errors and Micro-vibrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an estimation of the order of magnitude of the RMS random jitter , a quick overview of available literature shows that for LEO terminals is in the range of 20-45 μrad [25], and for an aircraft terminal few hundreds of microradians has been reported [27]. These figures refer to total amounts due to vibrations of the space-or aircraft, which are more relevant in the initial pointing and acquisition stages of the link, and usually compensated through a coarse pointing assembly.…”
Section: Pointing Errors and Micro-vibrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The host spacecraft platform's angular micro-vibrations, with frequencies spanning from less than 0.1 Hz to 100s of Hz (and amplitudes significantly larger than the transmit beam-width) are a major impediment to achieving the sub-μrad pointing requirement [50]. These micro-vibrations stem from guidance and control activities, such as momentum dumping and rocket firings.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the successor to the HST, the James Webb Space Telescope with a 6.5 m diameter, might achieve a pointing stability of 0.004 arcsec [2]. However, the microvibrations due to the onboard equipment in spacecraft will seriously degrade the image quality of the space telescope [3]. The microvibration sources include control moment gyros, reaction wheel assemblies, cryocoolers, solar panel deployment actuators, and other motion devices [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%