2021
DOI: 10.1088/2515-7655/ac0b37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In operando Raman and optical study of lithium polysulfides dissolution in lithium–sulfur cells with carrageenan binder

Abstract: In operando Raman and optical studies have been performed on lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries containing carrageenan binder in the sulfur cathode for chemical trapping of the polysulfides (PSs). Three different types of cells were used: coin cells, EL-cell and capillary cells to examine the PS speciation. With the coin cell we confirm the stability and cyclability of the carrageenan based Li–S cells and the improved capacity retention when compared to conventional polyvinylidene fluoride based Li–S cells. With … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure 4h,i, the Raman signals related to S 8 are observed at 151, 217, and 472 cm −1 during the discharge from open‐circuit voltage to 2.3 V. Afterward, Li 2 S 6 (392 cm −1 ) and Li 2 S 4 (454 cm −1 ) appear coupled with the disappearance of S 8 when the voltage is below 2.2 V. The Raman peaks of Li 2 S 6 and Li 2 S 4 vanish completely at 1.7 V and are gradually regenerated in the subsequent charge process, indicating the reversibility of sulfur conversion. [ 30,49–51 ] These results indicate that vulcanized PS side‐chains could not only interact with polysulfides to restrain shuttle effect but also mediate polysulfide redox process, contributing to high‐efficiency sulfur utilization.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As shown in Figure 4h,i, the Raman signals related to S 8 are observed at 151, 217, and 472 cm −1 during the discharge from open‐circuit voltage to 2.3 V. Afterward, Li 2 S 6 (392 cm −1 ) and Li 2 S 4 (454 cm −1 ) appear coupled with the disappearance of S 8 when the voltage is below 2.2 V. The Raman peaks of Li 2 S 6 and Li 2 S 4 vanish completely at 1.7 V and are gradually regenerated in the subsequent charge process, indicating the reversibility of sulfur conversion. [ 30,49–51 ] These results indicate that vulcanized PS side‐chains could not only interact with polysulfides to restrain shuttle effect but also mediate polysulfide redox process, contributing to high‐efficiency sulfur utilization.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The dried material was scratched from the foil and cold-pressed into a pellet (7 mm in diameter and 152 μm in thickness) under 0.75 tons pressure and subsequently dried at 120 °C in a vacuum oven inside a glovebox overnight. A modified electrochemical-cell (ECC-OPTO) was assembled inside the glovebox using the pellet as cathode, a lithium foil with a diameter of 9 mm as anode and LP57 (E-lyte, 1M LiPF6 in 3:7 EC/EMC) as electrolyte for operando X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements; further details about the cell and its assembly can be found in reference [30]. Diffraction data were recorded on a Rigaku Smartlab diffractometer in reflection geometry with a CuKα (λ1 = 1.54059, λ2 = 1.54441 Å; λ2/λ1 intensity ratio = 0.5) radiation source.…”
Section: Methodology: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dried material was scratched from the foil and cold-pressed into a pellet (7 mm in diameter and 152 μm in thickness) under 0.75 tons pressure and subsequently dried at 120 °C in a vacuum oven inside a glovebox overnight. A modified electrochemical-cell (ECC-OPTO) was assembled inside the glovebox using the pellet as cathode, a lithium foil with a diameter of 9 mm as anode and LP57 (E-lyte, 1M LiPF6 in 3:7 EC/EMC) as electrolyte for operando X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements; further details about the cell and its assembly can be found in reference [29]. Diffraction data were recorded on a Rigaku Smartlab diffractometer in reflection geometry with a CuKα (λ1 = 1.54059, λ2 = 1.54441 Å; λ2/λ1 intensity ratio = 0.5) radiation source.…”
Section: Methodology: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%