2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2008.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-mouth flavour release from milk proteins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the one hand, previous studies showed no effect of different texturizing agents (CMC, carrageenan, starch, pectin and gelatine) on maximum intensity and/or cumulative area data obtained from in vivo monitoring of flavor release (Aprea, Biasioli, Gasperi, Märk, & van Ruth, 2006;Lethuaut, Weel, Boelrijk, & Brossard, 2004;Mie, Reineccius, Knighton, & Grimsrud, 2004). On the other hand, some studies have shown a significant reduction of in-mouth flavor release due to the presence of CMC (Kühn, Delahunty, Considine, & Singh, 2009) and better flavor release properties from modified starch, which may be due to a salting-out effect (Cayot, Pretot, Doublier, Meunier, & Guichard, 2004;González-Tomás, Bayarri, Taylor, & Costell, 2007). As stated by Ferry et al (2006) differences in some thickener structure solutions (polymeric or globular) can also influence mouthfeel attributes and modify the release of chemical stimuli to the receptors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, previous studies showed no effect of different texturizing agents (CMC, carrageenan, starch, pectin and gelatine) on maximum intensity and/or cumulative area data obtained from in vivo monitoring of flavor release (Aprea, Biasioli, Gasperi, Märk, & van Ruth, 2006;Lethuaut, Weel, Boelrijk, & Brossard, 2004;Mie, Reineccius, Knighton, & Grimsrud, 2004). On the other hand, some studies have shown a significant reduction of in-mouth flavor release due to the presence of CMC (Kühn, Delahunty, Considine, & Singh, 2009) and better flavor release properties from modified starch, which may be due to a salting-out effect (Cayot, Pretot, Doublier, Meunier, & Guichard, 2004;González-Tomás, Bayarri, Taylor, & Costell, 2007). As stated by Ferry et al (2006) differences in some thickener structure solutions (polymeric or globular) can also influence mouthfeel attributes and modify the release of chemical stimuli to the receptors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An illustration of this phenomenon lies in the study of Hansson et al (2003) in which aroma concentrations in the nose were found to be about twice as high when pectin-containing systems were chewed compared to when they were just being held in the mouth. This could be explained by the variable entrapment of the volatiles within the food matrix according to its destructuration in the mouth (Boland et al, 2006;Déléris et al, 2011;Gierczynski et al, 2008;Hansson et al, 2003;Kühn, Delahunty, Considine, & Singh, 2009;Mestres et al, 2005;Mestres et al, 2006). Biochemical interactions between structuring agents and saliva components could also impact aroma perception.…”
Section: Texture-aroma Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Static in vitro extraction of the volatiles released from model matrices has mainly been performed using headspace methods (Boland et al, 2006;Déléris et al, 2011;Lethuaut et al, 2005;Weel et al, 2002;Zafeiropoulou et al, 2012), Solid Phase MicroExtraction (Keršienė et al, 2008;Kühn et al, 2009;Saint-Eve et al, 2009;Ventanas et al, 2010b) and liquid-liquid microextraction or solid phase extraction (Sáenz-Navajas, Campo, Fernández-Zurbano, Valentin, & Ferreira, 2010) (Table 2). Identification and quantification of volatiles has been carried out with GC/FID and/or GC/ MS instruments.…”
Section: Static Analysis Of Volatile Compounds In Sensory Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results on the whole therefore show that in vivo release of flavor compounds is a multifaceted process that is affected by both intrinsic (oral physiology, chewing and swallowing pattern heterogeneity of bolus, and so on) and extrinsic factors (cultivars, interindividuals variation) (Kühn and others 2009; Heenan and others 2012). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%