2016
DOI: 10.1111/cdev.12610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Infants' Hands: Identification of Preverbal Infants at Risk for Primary Language Delay

Abstract: Early identification of primary language delay is crucial to implement effective prevention programs. Available screening instruments are based on parents' reports and have only insufficient predictive validity. This study employed observational measures of preverbal infants' gestural communication to test its predictive validity for identifying later language delays. Pointing behavior of fifty-nine 12-month-old infants was analyzed and related to their language skills 1 year later. Results confirm predictive … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
63
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(43 reference statements)
10
63
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, open‐hand pointing (both produced alone and combined with non‐CV vocalizations) was a reliable negative predictor of language. This provides convergent evidence with recent studies that suggest that open‐handed pointing is a marker for risk of delay (Lüke, Grimminger, Rohlfing, Liszkowski, & Ritterfeld, ). Furthermore, as there was no evidence that gaze‐coordination affected the negative value of this predictor, we conclude that this may be a marker of a motoric delay rather than a social‐cognitive one.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In contrast, open‐hand pointing (both produced alone and combined with non‐CV vocalizations) was a reliable negative predictor of language. This provides convergent evidence with recent studies that suggest that open‐handed pointing is a marker for risk of delay (Lüke, Grimminger, Rohlfing, Liszkowski, & Ritterfeld, ). Furthermore, as there was no evidence that gaze‐coordination affected the negative value of this predictor, we conclude that this may be a marker of a motoric delay rather than a social‐cognitive one.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Infants’ language skills are predicted both by the age of emergence (Butterworth & Morissette, ; Carpenter, Nagell, Tomasello, Butterworth, & Moore, ; Desrochers, Morissette, & Ricard, ), and the frequency of pointing (Esseily, Jacquet, & Fagard, ; Mundy et al., ; Özçalışkan, Adamson, & Dimitrova, ; Rowe, ), although most studies have focused on the latter as an indicator. Specifically, the frequency of the canonical index‐finger pointing gesture, as opposed to the whole‐hand pointing gesture which emerges a few months earlier (Liszkowski & Tomasello, ; Lock, Young, Service, & Chandler, ), is positively predictive of language acquisition (Lüke, Grimminger, Rohlfing, Liszkowski, & Ritterfeld, ).…”
Section: Factors Influencing the Development Of Pointing Frequencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address child‐level and caregiver‐level factors, and how they may interact in development, we adopted a longitudinal approach and observed caregivers and their infants at 10 and 12 months in a semi‐natural setting previously shown to elicit pointing (Liszkowski & Tomasello, ; Liszkowski et al., ; Lüke et al., ). We analyzed infants’ and caregivers’ points, and caregivers’ verbal and nonverbal responses.…”
Section: Factors Influencing the Development Of Pointing Frequencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, infants use so called whole-hand points, in which the arm and the hand are extended toward a referent, followed by index-finger points, in which the arm and the index finger are clearly extended toward a referent (Lock et al, 1990;Liszkowski and Tomasello, 2011;Lüke et al, 2017b). Based on the large number of studies it is undisputable that the production of pointing gestures is a strong predictor for later language skills (for a meta-analysis see Colonnesi et al, 2010 (for recent research see Murillo and Belinchón, 2012;Beuker et al, 2013;Kuhn et al, 2014;Lüke et al, 2017aLüke et al, , 2019Salo et al, 2018). Yet, there is some debate about the specific aspect of pointing gestures responsible for this predictive value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following features are analyzed and discussed: 1. Onset or ability to produce pointing gestures at a certain age (Lüke et al, 2017a(Lüke et al, , 2019McGillion et al, 2017); 2. Number of pointing gestures (Beuker et al, 2013;Kuhn et al, 2014;Lüke et al, 2017b); 3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%