2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.10.142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-hospital mortality in older patients after ventricular assist device implantation: A national cohort study

Abstract: Objectives: To assess baseline patient characteristics and identify factors associated with in-hospital mortality after ventricular assist device (VAD) placement.Methods: Cross-sectional study using the National Inpatient Sample database from January 2010 to December 2014. Analyses were performed with sample weights provided by the National Inpatient Sample, which are reported AE the standard error of the mean.Results: Weighted samples yielded 15,021 AE 1111 patients who received a VAD. The mean age at time of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(51 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of age on mortality following LVAD implantation is variable. One analysis of the National Inpatient Sample found that in‐hospital mortality among recipients of LVAD was associated with age older than 65 years (OR = 1.76), as was female sex (OR = 1.27) . Among older patients, in‐hospital mortality increased from 17.2% to 48.2% when one or more high‐risk interventions (prolonged mechanical ventilation, hemodialysis, cardiac surgery, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation) were performed prior to LVAD placement .…”
Section: What Is the Effect Of Age On Outcomes?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The effect of age on mortality following LVAD implantation is variable. One analysis of the National Inpatient Sample found that in‐hospital mortality among recipients of LVAD was associated with age older than 65 years (OR = 1.76), as was female sex (OR = 1.27) . Among older patients, in‐hospital mortality increased from 17.2% to 48.2% when one or more high‐risk interventions (prolonged mechanical ventilation, hemodialysis, cardiac surgery, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation) were performed prior to LVAD placement .…”
Section: What Is the Effect Of Age On Outcomes?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One analysis of the National Inpatient Sample found that in‐hospital mortality among recipients of LVAD was associated with age older than 65 years (OR = 1.76), as was female sex (OR = 1.27) . Among older patients, in‐hospital mortality increased from 17.2% to 48.2% when one or more high‐risk interventions (prolonged mechanical ventilation, hemodialysis, cardiac surgery, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation) were performed prior to LVAD placement . Atluri et al found that age older than 70 years was an independent predictor for death, with overall survival of 75% at 1 year, 63% at 2 years, and 54% at 3 years .…”
Section: What Is the Effect Of Age On Outcomes?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is well‐recognized that aging is a risk factor for mortality in LVAD recipients. Using the National Inpatient Sample database, Lindvall et al, showed that elderly LVAD recipients (age ≥65 years) had a 48.2% hospital mortality if they had one or more of the following pre‐LVAD therapies: cardiac surgery, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, prolonged mechanical ventilation, or hemodialysis, while in younger (<65 years) patients the hospital mortality rate was 29.4% 6 . In another study, using the INTERMACS database to compare the outcomes of elderly (age ≥70 years) versus younger (age <70) recipients of CF‐LVAD implanted between June 2006 and April 2012, Atluri et al, reported that elderly patients had worse survival at 2 years than the younger ones (71% vs. 63%; p < .001) 7 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…65 years) had a 48.2% hospital mortality if they had one or more of the following pre-LVAD therapies: cardiac surgery, ECMO, prolonged mechanical ventilation, or hemodialysis, while in younger (<65 years) patients the hospital mortality rate was 29.4%. 5 In another study, using the INTERMACS database to compare the outcomes of elderly (age [?] 70 years) versus younger (age < 70) recipients of CF-LVAD implanted between June 2006 and April 2012, Atluri et al, reported that elderly patients had worse survival at 2 years than the younger ones (71% vs 63%, p < 0.001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%