In home or at home? How collective decision making in a new care facility enhances social interaction and wellbeing amongst older adults

Abstract

Benevolent, long-term care can threaten older adults' sense of autonomy in a residential home environment. Increasing reliance on a hotel style of living has been seen to erode social identity, life satisfaction and even survival or lifespan. Drawing on evidence from both gerontological and social psychological literature, this paper examines the links between the empowerment of residents and their subsequent quality of life in the context of a move into a new care facility in a medium-sized town in South-West England. A longitudinal experiment was conducted during which 27 residents on one floor of a new facility were involved in decisions surrounding its décor, while those on another floor were not. The residents' attitudes and behaviour were monitored at three points over five months (four weeks pre-move, four weeks post-move, and four months post-move). Consistent with the social identity literature, members of the empowered group reported increased identification with staff and fellow residents in the new home, displayed enhanced citizenship, reported improved wellbeing, and made more use of the communal space. Moreover the staff found the empowered residents to be more engaged with their environment and the people around them, to be generally happier and to have better health. These patterns were observed one month after the move and remained four months later. Some implications for theory and practice are discussed.

The effects of identification with a support group on the mental health of people with multiple sclerosis

“…Most clearly, MS patients (particularly those with Relapsing-Remitting and Primary Progressive MS) should be encouraged to engage with support groups, but more must be done to ensure they subjectively identify with these support groups (rather than simply attend them). Previous work has shown that giving group members a sense of collective agency over decisions regarding the group's development (such as deciding how to decorate the group's interaction space) enables group identification to develop, so such initiatives may prove fruitful in the current context [43].…”

Institutions as enablers of wellbeing: The Singapore Prison case study

“…By contrast, research in subjective wellbeing suggests that much more depends on improving the social context than on the delivery of specific services. The best illustration of this, and one that dovetails nicely with the Singapore Prison reforms, is provided by the elder-care experiments of Knight, Haslam and Haslam (2010). When residents of an elder-care facility were being moved to a new building, the control group (the residents of the previously happier floor in the old facility) were given the best of professional designs for their new shared spaces, while the experimental group were invited to get together to make their own design decisions.…”

The Relationship Between Group Identification and Satisfaction with Life in a Cross-Cultural Community Sample

“…Achieving the latter does not necessarily need to be overly complex or costly: Knight et al (2010) found that both group identification and SWL were enhanced for elderly care-home residents who were able to make collective decisions regarding how to decorate their living-space (versus those who were not).…”