2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11207-021-01847-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-flight Calibration and Data Reduction for the WISPR Instrument On Board the PSP Mission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The images were down-linked to Earth 2 × 2 binned (i.e., with a size of 960 × 1024 pixel 2 , which corresponds to a plate scale of 2 54 for WISPR-I and 3 39 for WISPR-O). The WISPR calibration procedures are described in Hess et al (2021).…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The images were down-linked to Earth 2 × 2 binned (i.e., with a size of 960 × 1024 pixel 2 , which corresponds to a plate scale of 2 54 for WISPR-I and 3 39 for WISPR-O). The WISPR calibration procedures are described in Hess et al (2021).…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter includes the instrumental straylight, and the star field. According to Hess et al (2021), WISPR-I stray-light is negligible up to the S/C heliocentric distances covered in Orbits 1 through 5. We have reassessed the stray-light level of WISPR-I images obtained during Encounters 7 through 10 following the same approach detailed in Paper I and found that it remains negligible.…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The WISPR images of Venus are processed using the standard Level 2 pipeline described in Hess et al. ( 2021 ). This processing removes the APS detector column to column bias pattern and corrects and normalizes the images so that the resulting data are consistent, regardless of the exposure time and gain setting used for a given image.…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of the field has increased substantially, requiring experimentation and subsequent reduction of exposure times to avoid saturation. These issues are discussed in more detail by Hess et al (2021). Here, as opposed to explicitly stating the observing parameters for all nine encounters thus far, we will instead refer to that publication and the WISPR project website, 8 from which so-called "summary files"-plain text metadata for all recorded observations-are readily available.…”
Section: Wispr Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Paper I, we studied observations recorded by WISPR-I on 2018 November 5, during PSPʼs first solar encounter, noting that a small portion of the dust trail was visible in WISPR-O, but was not considered at that time due to ongoing calibrations regarding the WISPR-O data. Since that time, the calibration procedures for WISPR-O have been finalized and published (Hess et al 2021) and a Level-3 (L3) data product for WISPR-O is routinely produced, thus enabling us to extend our investigation to this camera. This is fortuitous as the dust trail is now better observed in WISPR-O than WISPR-I, primarily because the evolving orbit of PSP has shifted the timing of our close approach to the trail to coincide with the trail's passage through WISPR-O, particularly since Encounter 4.…”
Section: Wispr Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%