2014
DOI: 10.1186/1748-7161-9-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In favour of the definition "adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis": juvenile and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis braced after ten years of age, do not show different end results. SOSORT award winner 2014

Abstract: BackgroundThe most important factor discriminating juvenile (JIS) from adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is the risk of deformity progression. Brace treatment can change natural history, even when risk of progression is high. The aim of this study was to compare the end of growth results of JIS subjects, treated after 10 years of age, with final results of AIS.MethodsDesign: prospective observational controlled cohort study nested in a prospective database. Setting: outpatient tertiary referral clinic spec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The etiology of AIS has a strong genetic component [13, 18, 33], with different patterns of inheritance [37, 47]. Additionally, multiple non-genetic causes have been associated with the development of AIS [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The etiology of AIS has a strong genetic component [13, 18, 33], with different patterns of inheritance [37, 47]. Additionally, multiple non-genetic causes have been associated with the development of AIS [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality of life and treatment satisfaction of the patient with AIS undergoing bracing is a subject of interest in the international literature [1, 1015, 1719, 25, 48, 49, 55, 57, 5963, 7678, 86]. The natural course of AIS has been found to be extremely variable [12, 13, 18, 33, 6062], and the effectivity rate of bracing treatment has historically been difficult to quantify. Nevertheless, bracing has been shown to be an effective non-surgical treatment method in different studies [1, 44–46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, 32 out of 125 patients in their study initiated brace treatment during adolescence. According to Donzelli et al [ 28 ], patients diagnosed during the juvenile period but braced later, during adolescence, can be considered, in terms of prognosis, as adolescent scoliosis. It is true that, like us, they did not find age differences in successful and unsuccessful patients, but rather a higher pre-brace Cobb angle was observed in those failing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Cobb angle at baseline was 31° (20–71). According to Donzelli et al [ 28 ], the response to bracing in patients diagnosed with JIS according to the SRS (from 3 years to 9 years and 11 months) but starting bracing at 10 years of age or later is not different to those diagnosed with AIS. Thus, we could expect a response similar to that of children with very early AIS in the Khoshbin et al study (initiation of bracing and pre-brace curve magnitude), and, knowing that bracing is dose dependent in AIS [ 14 ], the high incidence of final surgery should be no surprise, considering a compliance under 50%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is characterized by an abnormal three-dimensional curvature of the spine with an onset that can occur between birth and sexual maturity. Thus, it has been classified as infantile, juvenile, or adolescent based on when a curve is initiated 2 . Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) represents the most common form of scoliosis and occurs between the ages of 10 and 15 years, with girls affected more severely than boys 3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%