2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(03)00005-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In defense of the theory of indispensable attributes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kubovy (1981;Kubovy & Van Valkenburg, 2001) appeals to the notion of indispensable attributes for certain senses, specifically claiming that for audition, frequency acts as the auditory edge that defines and segregates an auditory object from other energy within the field (although see the recent communiqués between Neuhoff, 2003, andKubovy, 2003). The purported significance of frequency information, relative to locational information, in acoustic processing has also been emphasized by Woods, Alain, Diaz, Rhodes, and Ogawa (2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kubovy (1981;Kubovy & Van Valkenburg, 2001) appeals to the notion of indispensable attributes for certain senses, specifically claiming that for audition, frequency acts as the auditory edge that defines and segregates an auditory object from other energy within the field (although see the recent communiqués between Neuhoff, 2003, andKubovy, 2003). The purported significance of frequency information, relative to locational information, in acoustic processing has also been emphasized by Woods, Alain, Diaz, Rhodes, and Ogawa (2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kubovy, 1988;Handel, 1988;Neuhoff, 2003;Van Valkenburg & Kubovy, 2003). This is partly because in addition to asserting positive claims about frequency and time, TIA also makes certain negative claims about the role of space in audition and auditory attention (to which we return in the General Discussion).…”
Section: Frequency and Time As The "Indispensable Attributes" Of Audimentioning
confidence: 97%
“…While there are many similarities between visual and auditory scene analysis, differences in the physical properties of light and sound and how they propagate to our eyes and ears (Kubovy and Van Valkenburg 2001;Van Valkenburg and Kubovy 2003) as well as the organization of the sensory epithelia (Griffiths and Warren 2004;Shamma 2001) lead to differences in the heuristics that the brain uses to estimate the content of visual and auditory objects. An important difference between the visual and auditory scenes, for example, is that a visual source that is closer to the observer generally occludes a source that is further away.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%