“…Calls for such pluralism can be heard in a wide range of research disciplines, including the Natural Sciences (Chang, 2012), Organisational Science (Knudsen, 2003;Martin, 1993;Podsakoff & Dalton, 1987), Construction Management (Dainty, 2009;Raftery, McGeorge, & Walters, 1997), Information Systems (Mingers, 2001), Medical Informatics (Kaplan, 2001), Economics (Norgaard, 1989), Cultural Studies (Phillipov, 2013), Psychology (Crawford & Kimmel, 1999;Breen & Darlaston-Jones, 2010), Human Resources (Johns, 2003), Nursing (Rolfe, 1995) and Ergonomics (Hancock & Szalma, 2004;Hignett & Wilson, 2004). Similar concerns are also evident in fields that are traditionally constructivist, holistic or qualitative, including specific branches of Sociology (Lamont & Swidler, 2014), Psychology (Frost & Nolas, 2011) and Cultural Studies (Phillipov, 2013). 3 In many of these disciplines, arguments for pluralism are motivated by particular features of the subject matter, features which they share with design fixation research.…”