In defense of nuclear depth psychology.

Nelson, Linden L.

doi:10.1037/0003-066x.43.4.321

American Psychologist

1988

DOI: 10.1037/0003-066x.43.4.321

|View full text |Cite

In defense of nuclear depth psychology.

Linden L. Nelson¹

Abstract: Psychological aspects of nuclear war. Chichester, England: Wiley. Tysoe, M. (1982). Bargaining and negotiation. In A. Coleman (Ed.), Cooperation and competition in humans and animals. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold. Ury, W. L. (1985). Beyond the hotline." How crisis control can prevent nuclear war. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin. White, R. K. (Ed.). (1986). Psychology and the prevention of nuclear war. New York: New York University Press. Wilkenfeld, J., & Brecher, M. (1982). Superpower crisis management behavior. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

1988

1989

Publication Types

Select...

Article3

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent3

Authors

Journals

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…According to Linden Nelson (this issue, pp. 321–322), nuclear depth psychology, the approach to nuclear problems taken by most psychologists working in the area, is working quite well.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Must the psychology of avoiding nuclear war remain free and insignificant?

Blight¹

1988

American Psychologist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

of the participants--but by no means in directions suggested by Blight's sexy label.As his citation of ScheUing reflected, Blight identified whole-hog with the received wisdom of threat and deterrence in the military and arms control policy community. This is my second complaint.Third, and I could make a diagnostic depth psychological point of it were I so inclined, Blight declared himself for a naively conceived sociobiology of war. "The more we learn about our mammalian ancestors, the less optimistic we ought to become about somehow expunging human aggression" (p. 24)--as if computerized megadeaths were somehow understandable in terms of biological aggressiveness! Of course, I agree with him that the Hobbesian world of nation states cannot be wished away.Fourth, Blight prematurely dismissed either top-down (from the national leadership) or bottom-up (e.g., the Freeze movement) approaches to reversing the arms race and the escalation of threat. The collapse of recent U.S. policies in the Reagan administration, the shift in the domestic political atmosphere, and the novel initiatives from Gorbachev's Soviet leadership-all new since Blight's writing-leave the political situation a good deal more open now than it can have seemed to Blight. This is no time for psychologists, behavioral scientists, and citizens to give up the attempt to turn things around in Soviet-American relations.Blight is obviously correct that immense barriers stand in the way of we psychologists getting our most cogent analyses taken seriously by the policy establishment. Also, we can readily stipulate that psychological knowledge or modes of analysis are not by themselves sources of salvation. We urgently need to educate a generation of psychologists to know the arms control community and its arcane lore from the inside so that they can address these issues more competently and persuasively.In the meantime, as antidotes to Blight's view, I suggest a close reading of Ralph White's (1984) Fearful Warriors: A Psychological Profile of US.-Soviet Relations (White did his homework in mastering the international relations literature) and of Lloyd Can Governments Learn? American Foreign Policy and Central American Revolutions. Etheredge's portrayal of the assumptive world of "hard-ball politics" that prevails by self-selection and mutual confirmation in the policy community is a better guide than Blight provided to the obstacles that lie in the path of good policy.We have no grounds for optimism about the role of psychology in reducing the odds for nuclear war, but fortunately we can be more hopeful than Blight was (Smith, 1986). We had better be if we are to do all that we can on this extraordinary issue that involves us all.

show abstract

“…According to Linden Nelson (this issue, pp. 321–322), nuclear depth psychology, the approach to nuclear problems taken by most psychologists working in the area, is working quite well.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Must the psychology of avoiding nuclear war remain free and insignificant?

Blight¹

1988

American Psychologist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Images of Nuclear Activists in Four Countries

Zweigenhaft

Williamson

Spivey

et al. 1989

The Journal of Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Psychological Aspects of the Nuclear Arms Threat: Annotated Bibliography Update: I. A—F

French

1989

Psychol Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

hi@scite.ai

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

In defense of nuclear depth psychology.

Cited by 3 publications

References 9 publications

Must the psychology of avoiding nuclear war remain free and insignificant?

Must the psychology of avoiding nuclear war remain free and insignificant?

Images of Nuclear Activists in Four Countries

Psychological Aspects of the Nuclear Arms Threat: Annotated Bibliography Update: I. A—F

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About