1988
DOI: 10.2307/1430836
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Defense of Enlightenment: Foucault and Habermas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, “Habermas's work can be of varied use to feminists … as it offers a framework for analyzing the structure of modern life, its potentials for both emancipatory forms of life and forms of life issuing in political repression, market manipulation, and domination” (Meehan, 1995, p. 1). In response to yet another criticism, proposals have been made to show how TCA can be used productively in relation to the work of Foucault (Bahr, 1988), Derrida, and Lyotard (White, 1991).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, “Habermas's work can be of varied use to feminists … as it offers a framework for analyzing the structure of modern life, its potentials for both emancipatory forms of life and forms of life issuing in political repression, market manipulation, and domination” (Meehan, 1995, p. 1). In response to yet another criticism, proposals have been made to show how TCA can be used productively in relation to the work of Foucault (Bahr, 1988), Derrida, and Lyotard (White, 1991).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Related to the issue of universalism is a Foucauldian criticism that any form of modernization must be accompanied by overdeterminations of a disciplinary type, that is, techniques employed in the planning and implementation of social change comprise techniques of power. However, this criticism provides a complementary analysis rather than a contradiction of communicative action (Bahr, 1988). Foucault's critique of disciplinarity provides a more nuanced criticism of the micropractices of power than does Habermas's critique of lifeworld colonization.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%