2016
DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2015-103030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In defence of genital autonomy for children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been some propositions in Western countries to allow doctors to perform pricking [10, 15]. However, in all cases, the negative reactions against these suggestions from those supporting a zero tolerance approach have been fierce [1417]. As a result, no changes to allow pricking have been made.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been some propositions in Western countries to allow doctors to perform pricking [10, 15]. However, in all cases, the negative reactions against these suggestions from those supporting a zero tolerance approach have been fierce [1417]. As a result, no changes to allow pricking have been made.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 In the meantime, a precautionary approach suggests that non-therapeutic circumcision should generally not be performed until boys can 'assess the sensitivity of their own foreskins as compared to other parts of the penis -as well as their role in sexual experience more generally -in light of their own considered sexual preferences and values' . 8,[28][29][30] Declaration of interests: none declared.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A holistic lens is necessary to consider the full range of factors which may impact sexual function in FGC-affected women without further stigmatizing them by only narrowly focusing on the state of their altered genitalia (Sharif Mohamed, Wild, Earp, Johnson-Agbakwu, & Abdulcadir, 2020). Furthermore, it is also critically important to distinguish the ethical debate surrounding genital alterations performed on minors, and consider the human right to bodily integrity and genital autonomy of all minors regardless of gender (Brussels Collaboration on Bodily Integrity, 2019; Earp, 2016bEarp, , 2020. This must be further contextualized by the sociopolitical discourse around gender and race which are pivotal to the development of truly unbiased policy (Atallah et al, 2016), failing to do so further "others" non-White migrant women's bodies (Baillot, Murray, Connelly, & Howard, 2018;Johansen, 2017).…”
Section: Attitudes Norms and Control In Fluxmentioning
confidence: 99%