SAE Technical Paper Series 2002
DOI: 10.4271/2002-01-0745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-Cylinder Pressure Measurements with Optical Fiber and Piezoelectric Pressure Transducers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
1
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
1
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The scattering of points with respect to the diagonal of the graph allows judging about the repeatability of the experiment. The behaviour observed in Figure 4 attests for a good repeatability and is similar to that reported by Roth et al (2001) for transducers akin to the one used in this example. www.intechopen.com…”
Section: Validation Of the Transducer Mounting Locationsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The scattering of points with respect to the diagonal of the graph allows judging about the repeatability of the experiment. The behaviour observed in Figure 4 attests for a good repeatability and is similar to that reported by Roth et al (2001) for transducers akin to the one used in this example. www.intechopen.com…”
Section: Validation Of the Transducer Mounting Locationsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Short-term drift, known as thermal shock, results from the heat flux variations within each cycle and causes pressure readings to be slightly higher than the actual cylinder pressure during combustion and slightly smaller during the remaining part of the power stroke. It cannot be readily identified or suppressed during signal processing, and may endanger the reliability of cylinder pressure data [11,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. In this study, the extension of the short-term drift was assessed using the test procedure proposed by Randalph [19,20], and it was found to be compatible with data reported for transducers similar to that employed here [20].…”
Section: Signal Conditioners For the Piezoelectric Pressure Transducersupporting
confidence: 53%
“…It cannot be readily identified or suppressed during signal processing, and may endanger the reliability of cylinder pressure data [11,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. In this study, the extension of the short-term drift was assessed using the test procedure proposed by Randalph [19,20], and it was found to be compatible with data reported for transducers similar to that employed here [20].…”
Section: Signal Conditioners For the Piezoelectric Pressure Transducersupporting
confidence: 53%
“…However, independent studies [Roth, K.J. et al, 2002, Tousignant et al, 2002, Tousignant et al, 2004] indicate a lack of reproducibility in Optrand's commercially available transducers.…”
Section: Fiberoptic Pressure Transducersmentioning
confidence: 99%