2013
DOI: 10.1039/c3cc41979g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-cell covalent labeling of reactive His-tag fused proteins

Abstract: A new method for in-cell protein labeling was developed. This method employed a binding-induced nucleophilic reaction between the Cys-appended His-tag and the Ni(II)-NTA containing an α-chloroacetamide. Using this method, not only labeling of His-tag fused proteins but also the detection of a protein-protein interaction was achieved inside living cells.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
50
0
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
50
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The perturbation of protein localization may be attributed to the relatively large size of RFP (27.5 kDa) (5) compared with XPA122 (15 kDa). By contrast, using the Ni-NTA-AC probe, His-XPA122 was found to be enriched in the nucleus, in agreement with the previously reported intracellular localization of XPA, a protein involved in the recognition of DNA damage during nucleotide excision repair processes (16,29). Taken together, we demonstrate that the new fluorescent probe Ni-NTA-AC can be preferentially applied to track the abundances and localization of His-tagged proteins in live mammalian cells, in particular for small proteins.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Ni-nta-ac Probe For Labeling Of His-tagged Prosupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The perturbation of protein localization may be attributed to the relatively large size of RFP (27.5 kDa) (5) compared with XPA122 (15 kDa). By contrast, using the Ni-NTA-AC probe, His-XPA122 was found to be enriched in the nucleus, in agreement with the previously reported intracellular localization of XPA, a protein involved in the recognition of DNA damage during nucleotide excision repair processes (16,29). Taken together, we demonstrate that the new fluorescent probe Ni-NTA-AC can be preferentially applied to track the abundances and localization of His-tagged proteins in live mammalian cells, in particular for small proteins.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Ni-nta-ac Probe For Labeling Of His-tagged Prosupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Recently a di-NTA-based fluorescent probe containing an α-chloroacetamide that targets the Cys-appended His-tag (CysHis 6 -tag) was reported to be able to label intracellular Cys-His 6 -tagged proteins in live cells (16). However, the di-NTA fluorophore conjugate itself could hardly enter cells, unless the conjugate was attached to a cargo consisting of a cell-penetrating peptide and fluorescent quencher (a dabsyl-appended icosapeptide with a dabsyl group, a tetra-His, and an octa-Arg), enforcing the probe to enter cells to label Cys-His 6 -tagged instead of His 6 -tagged proteins.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CysN i-gerichtetes Elektrophil [156] Ni eGFP (27) 6.2 LysN i-gerichtetes Elektrophil [216] Ni Transferrin (77) 6.2 viele…”
Section: Proximitätsvermitteltunclassified
“…Obwohl sie auf eine einzige Gruppe an Funktionalisierungen beschränkt ist, hat sich die Azidgruppe zu einem essenziellen Bestandteil der gängigen Biokonjugationsmethoden entwickelt und die oben beschriebene Te chnik wurde bereits von verschiedenen Arbeitsgruppen ausführlich angewendet. Gleichermaßen fallen auch Technologien zur Affinitätsidentifikation durch Metalle,w ie etwa Nickel/His-Tags [154][155][156] oder Zink/Tetraaspartat-Paare, [157][158][159] weitestgehend aus seinem Fokus heraus,obwohl sie fürAnwendungen zur Aufreinigung oder Detektion von Nutzen sein kçnnen. [138] Kürzlich wurde außerdem eine reaktionszentrenselektive Version der Azidtransferreaktion an Avidinderivaten durch die Inkorporation eines Biotinzentrums in den Imidazolring erreicht.…”
Section: Angewandte Chemieunclassified
“…About 50% labeling efficiency was observed after 20 min (Figure 2c), and after 100 min, the labeling yield was determined to be 84%. The second-order rate constant was calculated as 1100 M −1 s −1 ( Figure S2), which is comparable to previously reported protein labeling reactions based on a reactive His-tag, 21 CLIP-tag, 4 or on a tetrazine ligation, 32 a fast bio-orthogonal click reaction. However, it is about ∼25-and ∼65-fold slower than SNAP-tag 4 and FlAsH-tag 17 based labeling reactions, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%