2016
DOI: 10.1080/10401334.2016.1190730
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Brief: Validity of Case Summaries in Written Examinations of Clinical Reasoning

Abstract: There is good evidence regarding the scoring and generalizability of written case summaries for assessment of clinical problem representation. Further evidence regarding the extrapolation and implications of these assessments is warranted.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results show that there were limitations in conducting the CBME model during the COVID-19 pandemic (Ferrel & Ryan, 2020;Rose, 2020). Clearly the CBME module needs proper planning, caution, and high vigilance because in Indonesia it involves at least six parties, covering students, field and faculty educators, faculty teams, community, tribal chief/public figures, and local government (Dory et al, 2014;Bernstein et al, 2016). The input from this large number of people is necessary as it relates to various learning methods, field activities, and mentoring by various supervisors tailored to activities or cases in the community.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results show that there were limitations in conducting the CBME model during the COVID-19 pandemic (Ferrel & Ryan, 2020;Rose, 2020). Clearly the CBME module needs proper planning, caution, and high vigilance because in Indonesia it involves at least six parties, covering students, field and faculty educators, faculty teams, community, tribal chief/public figures, and local government (Dory et al, 2014;Bernstein et al, 2016). The input from this large number of people is necessary as it relates to various learning methods, field activities, and mentoring by various supervisors tailored to activities or cases in the community.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several evaluation methods were implemented to assess various aspects of competencies among students including aspects of knowledge, attitudes, and behavior. The combination of various assessments was applied for the purpose of assessing students from various aspects combining cognitive, practical, and analytical abilities (Dory et al, 2014). The learning evaluation modalities are shown in detail in Table 3.…”
Section: Student's Assessment and Clerkship Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Advanced formats match typed-in questions with the list to enable automatic scoring A drawback is that more than one entry word is difficult to recognize automatically, and mistakes can be made if multiple words are required. In addition, the same drawbacks as with multiple-choice questions apply, without the cueing disadvantage Written case summaries (Dory et al 2016) Candidates receive multiple case vignettes describing in lay language a patient's history of present illness, past medical history, and physical examination findings. They must summarize the case as they would present to an attending staff, in a few sentences using medical terminology (semantic qualifiers) to measure problem representation.…”
Section: Current Methods Of Assessing Clinical Reasoningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Case‐based instruction is a well‐supported form of a clinically integrated curriculum (Higgs, 1993; Kassirer, 2010; Klement et al, 2016; ten Cate et al, 2018; Weidenbusch et al, 2019). In a pre‐professional course without access to a clinical setting, paper cases may be the most feasible and effective method of case‐based instruction (Dory et al, 2016; Custers, 2018; Boshuizen and Schmidt, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%