2010
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2010-11052-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-beam measurements of sub-nanosecond nuclear lifetimes with a mixed array of HPGe and LaBr3:Ce detectors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
56
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These scintillation detectors have much better energy resolution, about 3% at 662 keV, than traditional scintillation materials. In addition, they are very fast, a property which can be exploited to measure lifetimes of excited states in the 100 ps -10 ns region (Marginean et al, 2010). At DESPEC a fast-timing array is under construction (Regan, 2012).…”
Section: Examples Of Decay Spectroscopy Detectors At Despecmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These scintillation detectors have much better energy resolution, about 3% at 662 keV, than traditional scintillation materials. In addition, they are very fast, a property which can be exploited to measure lifetimes of excited states in the 100 ps -10 ns region (Marginean et al, 2010). At DESPEC a fast-timing array is under construction (Regan, 2012).…”
Section: Examples Of Decay Spectroscopy Detectors At Despecmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy dependence of the time response ("time walk") of the LaBr 3 :Ce detectors was determined with a 60 Co source using the method described in Ref. [11] in which the time response of each detector is fitted with a polynomial function and corrected down to ∼100 keV in offline analysis. The half-lives of excited states populated in the reaction were measured by extracting the time difference between γ rays observed in pairs of LaBr 3 :Ce detectors.…”
Section: Experiments and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The timing information in each LaBr 3 :Ce detector was recorded relative to the master trigger and the time difference between any two detectors was found by subtracting their times relative to the trigger as described in Ref. [11]. Three-dimensional E γ 1 -E γ 2 -T histograms (cubes) were constructed in such a way that the time difference between two transitions can be obtained by gating on their photopeaks on the energy axes of the cube [11].…”
Section: Experiments and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations