2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:nals.0000034514.27887.d9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In a Mediative Mood: The Semantics of the German Reportive Subjunctive

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If John learned that Mary were pregnant, he would be devastated does not imply that Mary is in fact pregnant; but in the sentence If John learned that Mary is pregnant, he would be devastated, we obtain a peculiar (‘Double Access’) reading in which the worlds referred to in the embedded clause must include both the counterfactual world(s) picked out by the if ‐clause and the world of utterance (this was the effect we saw in the temporal domain in: John knew two months ago that Mary is pregnant; see Schlenker, 2004b for a comparison between temporal and modal ‘Double Access’ readings ). In addition, there are moods (the ‘Konjunktiv I’ in German) which can exclusively be evaluated with respect to the context of a reported speech act—they are the direct counterpart of the ‘logophoric’ pronominal elements of Ewe and Gokana that were discussed earlier (Roncador, 1988; Schlenker, 2003; Stechow, 2003; Fabricius‐Hansen and Saebø, 2004).…”
Section: Systems Of Referential Classification Across Ontologicalmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…If John learned that Mary were pregnant, he would be devastated does not imply that Mary is in fact pregnant; but in the sentence If John learned that Mary is pregnant, he would be devastated, we obtain a peculiar (‘Double Access’) reading in which the worlds referred to in the embedded clause must include both the counterfactual world(s) picked out by the if ‐clause and the world of utterance (this was the effect we saw in the temporal domain in: John knew two months ago that Mary is pregnant; see Schlenker, 2004b for a comparison between temporal and modal ‘Double Access’ readings ). In addition, there are moods (the ‘Konjunktiv I’ in German) which can exclusively be evaluated with respect to the context of a reported speech act—they are the direct counterpart of the ‘logophoric’ pronominal elements of Ewe and Gokana that were discussed earlier (Roncador, 1988; Schlenker, 2003; Stechow, 2003; Fabricius‐Hansen and Saebø, 2004).…”
Section: Systems Of Referential Classification Across Ontologicalmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Summing up, the above arguments indicate that a presupposition-like analysis of durch is plausible and that such an approach involves an extension of presupposition theory to apply also to the sentence-internal level (see also Fabricius-Hansen and Saebø 2004).…”
Section: The Semantics Of Durch As a Sentence-internal Presuppositionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Insofern zeichnet sich bei dem deutschen Indikativ ein gewissermaßen 'liberaleres' System als im Norwegischen ab; vgl. das folgende Solfjeld (2007: 13) Es werden im Folgenden weitgehend Fragestellungen aufgegriffen, die schon in Pütz (1989Pütz ( , 1994, Askedal (1997), Fabricius-Hansen (1989, Fabricius -Hansen /Saebø (2004), Solfjeld (2007) und nicht zuletzt neuerdings in Vadøy (2008) aufgegriffen worden sind.…”
Section: Evidentialität Und Referatindikatoren Im Deutschen Und Norweunclassified