2008
DOI: 10.1016/s1507-1367(10)60087-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IMRT using simultaneous integrated boost (66 Gy in 6 weeks) with and without concurrent chemotherapy in head and neck cancer – toxicity evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies have been reported by Vosmik et al for simultaneous integrated boost and toxicity evaluation in IMRT for head and neck cancers with and without concurrent chemotherapy. 6 In this study, PTV boost consisted of the gross tumor volume and lymph nodes containing visible macroscopic tumor or biopsy-proven positive lymph nodes, whereas the PTV elective consisted of elective nodal regions. The CTV was created by manual contouring which included the GTV with a margin of 10 mm for CTV and 3 mm for PTV, respectively, which involves microscopic spread and clinically uninvolved lymph nodes and retrophargeal nodes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have been reported by Vosmik et al for simultaneous integrated boost and toxicity evaluation in IMRT for head and neck cancers with and without concurrent chemotherapy. 6 In this study, PTV boost consisted of the gross tumor volume and lymph nodes containing visible macroscopic tumor or biopsy-proven positive lymph nodes, whereas the PTV elective consisted of elective nodal regions. The CTV was created by manual contouring which included the GTV with a margin of 10 mm for CTV and 3 mm for PTV, respectively, which involves microscopic spread and clinically uninvolved lymph nodes and retrophargeal nodes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The investigation of X-ray radiation for patient therapy moved into clinical practice in the early 1920s. 1 Since the first uses of radiation to treat cancer, important changes and advancements have occurred, [2][3][4][5] including: (1) the generation of higher energy radiation beams from linear accelerators; (2) the use of computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET), magnetic resonance (MR), and other image data sets to create three-dimensional planning models to accurately guide treatment;…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%