2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1127(02)00321-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imputing tree-lists from aerial attributes for complex stands of south-eastern British Columbia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
55
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nearest neighbour techniques can be used to predict categorical and continuous variables and univariate or multivariate response variables [10]. This ability to predict multivariate response variables makes nearest neighbour imputation particularly promising for the prediction of probability density functions, particularly for complex stands with multiple species and a variety of tree sizes [12]. The size class distributions for these stands tend to be multimodal and not easily represented by parametric functions [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nearest neighbour techniques can be used to predict categorical and continuous variables and univariate or multivariate response variables [10]. This ability to predict multivariate response variables makes nearest neighbour imputation particularly promising for the prediction of probability density functions, particularly for complex stands with multiple species and a variety of tree sizes [12]. The size class distributions for these stands tend to be multimodal and not easily represented by parametric functions [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ground data) to aerial data (Temesgen et al, 2003), satellite imagery (Eskelson et al, 2009a), and light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data (Hudak et al, 2008;Goerndt et al, 2010). Different analyses have ranked the methods and data sources differently in different forest types.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For more details, see text. (Moeur & Stage 1995, Temesgen et al 2003, aerial images together with, or independently of, data derived from laser scanning (Naesset 1997, 2007, Means et al 1999, Holmström et al 2001, Muinonen et al 2001, Holmgren 2004, Eskelson et al 2008. More recently, similar research in Lithuania reached the conclusion that summary statistics only, such as the mean volume of growing stock per hectare for some areas, could be applicable operationally if the k-NN predictions were done at a forest compartment level .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%