2012
DOI: 10.1155/2012/725412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imputation of the Date of HIV Seroconversion in a Cohort of Seroprevalent Subjects: Implications for Analysis of Late HIV Diagnosis

Abstract: Objectives. Since subjects may have been diagnosed before cohort entry, analysis of late HIV diagnosis (LD) is usually restricted to the newly diagnosed. We estimate the magnitude and risk factors of LD in a cohort of seroprevalent individuals by imputing seroconversion dates. Methods. Multicenter cohort of HIV-positive subjects who were treatment naive at entry, in Spain, 2004–2008. Multiple-imputation techniques were used. Subjects with times to HIV diagnosis longer than 4.19 years were considered LD. Result… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the strong reduction of the HIV epidemic among IDU in Italy since 1990 [19], our results evidence a high proportion of LP and the highest proportion of persons with AHD among IDU; similar results were reported in a study conducted in Spain [20]. These findings can be explained by a lower HIV testing uptake in drug-treatment centers in the last decade [21] mainly attributable to the decline in HIV prevalence among IDU [22] and in the number of persons who inject drugs [21].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Despite the strong reduction of the HIV epidemic among IDU in Italy since 1990 [19], our results evidence a high proportion of LP and the highest proportion of persons with AHD among IDU; similar results were reported in a study conducted in Spain [20]. These findings can be explained by a lower HIV testing uptake in drug-treatment centers in the last decade [21] mainly attributable to the decline in HIV prevalence among IDU [22] and in the number of persons who inject drugs [21].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Loss to follow‐up was also higher in patients with better clinical status, so the residual bias, if any, would tend to overestimate incidence rates in migrants. Finally, selection bias could have been present in the DD analysis, as this was restricted to newly diagnosed patients recruited to the cohort, the implications of which were discussed in a previous publication for this cohort . The results of this study indicate different sources of inequality in HIV management and disease progression which are important for public health policies and service planning and delivery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Some surrogates previously used include down-regulation of CD127 on CD4 cells and the degree of immune activation. A recent study from Nigeria estimated the time between HIV seroconversion and diagnosis to be 6.1 years for men and 7.3 years for women [40][41][42][43]. Using the formula derived in that study, the probable time from seroconversion to presentation for care among our patients would be 2.3 years for men and 2.6 years for women.…”
Section: Percentage Of Patientsmentioning
confidence: 98%