2023
DOI: 10.1109/tcyb.2022.3167995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imputation of Missing Values in Time Series Using an Adaptive-Learned Median-Filled Deep Autoencoder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some other works (Che et al 2018;Cao et al 2018;Tang et al 2020) integrate the missing prediction as an intermediate step in time series prediction. In terms of auto-encoder-based methods, some other works (Miranda et al 2011(Miranda et al , 2012Pan et al 2022) take the missing parts as random noises and recover the missing value with the output of the delicately-designed auto-encoder. Moreover, with the recent advancement of generative adversarial theory, many works(Weihan 2020; Luo et al 2019;Yoon, Jordon, and Schaar 2018) follow the basic generative adversarial idea with the utilization of deep learning neural networks to train the specifically structured generators and discriminators and generate the value of the missing parts.…”
Section: Related Work Missing Data Imputationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some other works (Che et al 2018;Cao et al 2018;Tang et al 2020) integrate the missing prediction as an intermediate step in time series prediction. In terms of auto-encoder-based methods, some other works (Miranda et al 2011(Miranda et al , 2012Pan et al 2022) take the missing parts as random noises and recover the missing value with the output of the delicately-designed auto-encoder. Moreover, with the recent advancement of generative adversarial theory, many works(Weihan 2020; Luo et al 2019;Yoon, Jordon, and Schaar 2018) follow the basic generative adversarial idea with the utilization of deep learning neural networks to train the specifically structured generators and discriminators and generate the value of the missing parts.…”
Section: Related Work Missing Data Imputationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…State-of-the-art imputation methods include principal component analysis (PCA) [9], [10] based on machine learning, expectation maximization based on statistical methods, and autoencoders and generative adversarial nets (GAN) based on deep learning [11]- [15]. Each method is more applicable than the others in certain situations based on its advantages and disadvantages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, expectation maximization requires assumptions about data distribution and cannot be applied to a dataset with a mixture of continuous and categorical variables [16], whereas an autoencoder can be used for estimating missing data when part of the dataset is missing, but requires a complete dataset for training [17]. On the other hand, generative adversarial imputation nets (GAIN), the latest technique for data imputation based on GAN, exhibit excellent data imputation performance even when complete data are unavailable [11]- [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they are powerless in the face of deep learning-based observers and classifiers structured by complex multilayer nonlinearities. [16][17][18][19] In the field of explainable artificial intelligence, 20,21 attribution algorithms 22 are techniques for enhancing the interpretability of deep networks. It aims to evaluate the contribution of network inputs to the outputs based on the learned knowledge from a well-trained classification model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods provide effective FI for shallow learning‐based fault detection indices. However, they are powerless in the face of deep learning‐based observers and classifiers structured by complex multilayer nonlinearities 16‐19 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%