2011
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwr155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imputation of Incident Events in Longitudinal Cohort Studies

Abstract: Longitudinal cohort studies normally identify and adjudicate incident events detected during follow-up by retrieving medical records. There are several reasons why the adjudication process may not be successfully completed for a suspected event including the inability to retrieve medical records from hospitals and an insufficient time between the suspected event and data analysis. These "incomplete adjudications" are normally assumed not to be events, an approach which may be associated with loss of precision … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of missing stroke data due to ongoing adjudication of stroke events, as well as differential retrieval of medical records, we utilized multiple imputation techniques to classify in process stroke events using a logistic function predicting the likelihood that an attempted record retrieval would result in an adjudicated stroke. 12 Ten imputed datasets were used, and 22% of reported events were eligible to be imputed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of missing stroke data due to ongoing adjudication of stroke events, as well as differential retrieval of medical records, we utilized multiple imputation techniques to classify in process stroke events using a logistic function predicting the likelihood that an attempted record retrieval would result in an adjudicated stroke. 12 Ten imputed datasets were used, and 22% of reported events were eligible to be imputed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of missing stroke data due to ongoing adjudication and differential retrieval of medical records, we applied multiple imputation techniques to classify potential stroke events using a logistic function predicting the likelihood that an attempted record retrieval would result in an adjudicated stroke. 24 The analysis cohort comprised 24,544 participants, excluding those with no follow-up (2%), self-reported stroke at baseline (6%), missing residential questionnaire (8%), and place of birth missing or out of the United States (2%). The end of follow-up for analysis was April 1, 2011, resulting in 141,736 person-years of follow-up.…”
Section: 18mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple imputation for suspected stroke events that could not be adjudicated because of inability to retrieve records and for records currently in the adjudication process (approximately 10% of suspected stroke events for each) was used to reduce potential bias; details of this approach are described elsewhere. 12 Standard protocol approvals, registrations, and patient consents. The study was approved by the institutional review boards of all participating universities and all participants provided written informed consent.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%