The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.94.045417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impurity invisibility in graphene: Symmetry guidelines for the design of efficient sensors

Abstract: Renowned for its sensitivity to detect the presence of numerous substances, graphene is an excellent chemical sensor. Unfortunately, which general features a dopant must have in order to enter the list of substances detectable by graphene are not exactly known. Here we demonstrate with a simple model calculation implemented in three different ways that one of such features is the symmetry properties of the impurity binding to graphene. In particular, we show that electronic scattering is suppressed when dopant… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note in passing that we observe, similar to Ref. [45], that the top-bonded impurities are strong scatterers compared to other impurity configurations, and the local bond-current profiles significantly rearrange and focus due to the impurities [30,77].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We note in passing that we observe, similar to Ref. [45], that the top-bonded impurities are strong scatterers compared to other impurity configurations, and the local bond-current profiles significantly rearrange and focus due to the impurities [30,77].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…2. The impurities can connect to the pristine GNR in four different configurations: 'Center' (C), 'Bridge' (B), 'Top' (T), and 'Substitutional' (S) [45]. For the impurities we set imp = 0.66γ and γ imp = −2.2γ in Eq.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27,30,32,78 The energy of such quasibound states depends on the interaction between the defect and the graphene lattice which is highly sensitive to the position of the defect. 33,79,80 For vacancies and substitutional atoms, quasibound states with energies in direct vicinity of the Dirac point arise in a robust manner. In transport, such defects act as resonant scatterers exhibiting a strong peak in the scattering cross section at the resonance energy which suppresses the conductivity 124,125 and affects electron cooling.…”
Section: Disordered Graphenementioning
confidence: 99%
“…3(a). E 2s of the Li 2s state as well as the invisibility of shortrange impurity potentials due to adatoms in the hollow site [35,55,56]. At higher energies, both the intra and intervalley rates increase dramatically and peak at the energy ε ≈ 1.75 eV of the van Hove singularity (vHS) in the DOS in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%