2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-016-9834-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impurity effect of Mg on the generalized planar fault energy of Al

Abstract: Generalized Planar Fault Energy (GPFE) curves are widely used to evaluate the deformation behavior of metals and alloys. In the present work, a systematic analysis of the microscopic plastic deformation mechanism of face-centered cubic Al in comparison to Cu was conducted based on GPFE curves generated via first-principles calculations. Focus has been put on the effects of Mg impurities in terms of local concentration and local atomic arrangement nearby the deformation plane, upon the GPFE curve of Al, with th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should also be considered that the SFE of pure aluminum (annealed) is equal to 174 mJ/m 2 , while the SFE of the alloy with 6.28% magnesium content is 151.6 mJ/m 2 . In other words, even deformed alloys with extremely high magnesium content maintain a high level of SFE, compared to other materials [20]. Considering the data, presented by this source, it may be assumed that Al-95 alloy (with account for its high purity) energy will be equal to 177 mJ/m 2 , Al-Mg1-168.0 mJ/m 2 , Al-Mg4-154.7 mJ/m 2 , thus SFE difference for two extreme alloys will be slightly above 22 mJ/m 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It should also be considered that the SFE of pure aluminum (annealed) is equal to 174 mJ/m 2 , while the SFE of the alloy with 6.28% magnesium content is 151.6 mJ/m 2 . In other words, even deformed alloys with extremely high magnesium content maintain a high level of SFE, compared to other materials [20]. Considering the data, presented by this source, it may be assumed that Al-95 alloy (with account for its high purity) energy will be equal to 177 mJ/m 2 , Al-Mg1-168.0 mJ/m 2 , Al-Mg4-154.7 mJ/m 2 , thus SFE difference for two extreme alloys will be slightly above 22 mJ/m 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This texture pattern change is mainly associated with the effect of magnesium to maximally decrease the stacking fault energy. In pure aluminum, it reaches 174 mJ/m 2 , and in the alloy with 6.28% magnesium content, it reaches 151.6 mJ/m 2 [20].…”
Section: Componentmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, a recent first principles calculation based on density function theory (DFT) shows that an addition of Mg in Al can only slightly decrease the SFE and thus the twinning ability is slightly improved [24]. This has been confirmed by an experimental study on an Al-7Mg alloy subjected to dynamic plastic deformation (DPD) under a strain rate of ~10 2 s -1 [25], in which no deformation twins could be found.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Since the parameter A is traditionally considered to be proportional to the third-power of the stacking fault energy [20], a large reduction of this latter parameter [21,22] could indeed result in a decrease of one or even two orders of magnitude in the strain rate for a given effective stress. Yet, recent investigations present a quite different picture of the situation, since alloying actually only slightly reduces stacking fault energy, and this reduction is by far too modest to account for the dramatic reduction in the parameter A [23]. Thus, by Equation (1), one can still obtain an excellent description of the experimental data, but this description largely remains of a phenomenological nature, and any possible correlation with the microstructural evolution of the material is still based on weak bases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%