1975
DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1975.tb02973.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impulsivity: Self‐report and Performance Measure

Abstract: Summary. A sample of 98 boys, aged 11–12 years, completed the Junior Eysenck Personality Inventory and were individually administered Kagan's Matching Familiar Figures test of reflection/impulsivity. Four groups were formed on the basis of median splits on two indices of impulsivity and a two‐way analysis of variance was carried out against Eysenck's personality dimensions and an additional impulsivity factor derived from the same inventory. The fact that no main effects or interactions were obtained for any … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the correlations between SAT and personality, our results are in line with previous research in which SAT scores did not show significant correlations with questionnaire measures of impulsivity (Bentler & McClain, 1976;Cairns & Harbison, 1975;Carretero-Dios et al, 2009;Glow et al, 1983;Victor et al, 1985). As mentioned earlier in the Introduction section, when SAT scores are considered as a measure of R-I cognitive style, they are not expected to correlate with measures of personality.…”
Section: Sat and Self-reported Measures Of Impulsivitysupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding the correlations between SAT and personality, our results are in line with previous research in which SAT scores did not show significant correlations with questionnaire measures of impulsivity (Bentler & McClain, 1976;Cairns & Harbison, 1975;Carretero-Dios et al, 2009;Glow et al, 1983;Victor et al, 1985). As mentioned earlier in the Introduction section, when SAT scores are considered as a measure of R-I cognitive style, they are not expected to correlate with measures of personality.…”
Section: Sat and Self-reported Measures Of Impulsivitysupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Additionally, when SAT scores are considered a measure of cognitive style, they are not supposed to correlate with measures of impulsivity as a personality trait. In this regard, research has been relatively consistent in showing absence of correlation between SAT scores and questionnaire measures of impulsivity (Bentler & McClain, 1976;Cairns & Harbison, 1975;Carretero-Dios et al, 2009;Glow, Lange, Glow, & Barnett, 1983;Victor, Halverson, & Montague, 1985). However, the independence of the two constructs has also been called into question (Block, Block, & Harrington, 1974;Block, Gjerde, & Block, 1986).…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Several researchers have suggested that impulsivity may be a multidimensional construct that can be measured in several different ways (e.g., behavioral, self-report) (e.g., Barratt, Orozco-Cabal, & Moeller, 2004;Cairns & Harbison, 1975). Eysenck, Pearson, Easting, and Allsop (1985) suggest that there may be two distinct components of impulsivity, impulsiveness (i.e., the tendency to act on &dquo;the spur of the moment&dquo; without regard for consequences) and venturesomeness (i.e., a willingness to take action in the face of risks) (Eysenck, 1984).…”
Section: Relationships Amongmentioning
confidence: 99%