2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2020.109307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impulse response identification from input/output binary measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and A in (22). 1 Based on the above state-space representation, the evolutionary equation of x (k) for a given model parameter θ [h] and the related non-linear output equation are given by:…”
Section: Filteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…and A in (22). 1 Based on the above state-space representation, the evolutionary equation of x (k) for a given model parameter θ [h] and the related non-linear output equation are given by:…”
Section: Filteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…System identification from binary sensors is addressed in [15] for Finite Impulse Response (FIR) models under the (strong) assumption that that noise distribution is exactly known. Algorithms for identification of FIR models from binary input and output measurements have been recently presented in [16], [22]. Both of these contributions are based on the assumption that the (hidden) input is normally distributed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that we consider here constant thresholds on quantizers. The proposed algorithms are an extension of the offline algorithm presented in [20]. The algorithms are based on the least mean squares (LMS) algorithm and the estimation of correlation and cross‐correlation function of the input and the output.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%