2007
DOI: 10.1109/tdei.2007.4401234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impulse breakdown voltages of air gaps: a new approach to atmospheric correction factors applicable to international standards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results from Figure 4 show clear differences between the different correction factors found in the technical literature, differences that tend to increase with the increasing altitude. From these results it is clear that the correction factor found in Ortéga et al [66] sets a bottom limit.…”
Section: Conductors Of Circular Cross Sectionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Results from Figure 4 show clear differences between the different correction factors found in the technical literature, differences that tend to increase with the increasing altitude. From these results it is clear that the correction factor found in Ortéga et al [66] sets a bottom limit.…”
Section: Conductors Of Circular Cross Sectionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Therefore, according to Equation (22), as the altitude increases by 1000 m, the negative corona inception voltage decreases by 8.95% whereas the positive one decreases by 9.15%, so these trends are not in close agreement with Peek's formula [65]. Ortéga et al [66] proposed a correction factor for the 50% breakdown voltage U 50 of rod-plane air gaps subjected to positive-polarity lightning impulses based on laboratory tests, combining the effects of humidity and density:…”
Section: Conductors Of Circular Cross Sectionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Equation (9) indicates that the hot stick safety margin in low-altitude areas is 3.04. The line worker's safety can be guaranteed with this level of safety margin.…”
Section: B Hot Stick Minimum Approach Distancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Referring to [25] where U 50 of rod-plane air gap is represented as a function of both air density and absolute humidity, a fitting formula is obtained below U 50 = 5.678 × (79.319 × d × r + 0.028 × H + 1.642) × I −0.018 × g 0.003 20 (4) where ρ is the air density. The determination coefficient of this formula is 0.997.…”
Section: Relationship Between U 50 and Ambient Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%