The Cambridge History of Fifteenth-Century Music
DOI: 10.1017/cho9781139057813.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvisation as concept and musical practice in the fifteenth century

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This aim was based on Tinctoris's own assertion that formal composition (res facta) depended on the same technique as singing super librum (Tinctoris 1477, II, xxi), a point made by theorists as distant as Prosdocimus and Lusitano (Prosdocimus [1412(Prosdocimus [ ] 1984Canguilhem 2011, 94). While relative definitions of res facta and cantare super librum have been extensively debated (Bent 1983;Blackburn 1987;Canguilhem 2015), more important here was the a empt to test for a shared basis in the simple counterpoint of Book I of De arte contrapuncti. [2.2] Central to this testing was a simple software tool of my own design (Daly 2020, 69-76).…”
Section: Contrapuntal Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This aim was based on Tinctoris's own assertion that formal composition (res facta) depended on the same technique as singing super librum (Tinctoris 1477, II, xxi), a point made by theorists as distant as Prosdocimus and Lusitano (Prosdocimus [1412(Prosdocimus [ ] 1984Canguilhem 2011, 94). While relative definitions of res facta and cantare super librum have been extensively debated (Bent 1983;Blackburn 1987;Canguilhem 2015), more important here was the a empt to test for a shared basis in the simple counterpoint of Book I of De arte contrapuncti. [2.2] Central to this testing was a simple software tool of my own design (Daly 2020, 69-76).…”
Section: Contrapuntal Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%