2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving working equine welfare in ‘hard-win’ situations, where gains are difficult, expensive or marginal

Abstract: PurposeBrooke is a non-government organisation with working equine welfare programmes across Africa, Asia and Latin America. In 2014, staff from ten country programmes were asked to identify ‘no-win’ situations (subsequently reframed as ‘hard-wins’)—where improving equine welfare is proving difficult, expensive and/or marginal—in order to inform strategic decisions on how to approach, manage and mitigate for such situations.MethodsThe Delphi-type consultation process had three phases. Round 1 posed five questi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(28 reference statements)
1
30
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Most horses had a positive general attitude, which agrees with previous studies on the attitude of working equids towards humans [13,18]. Those horses reported with a negative general attitude were more likely to have neglected hooves and there was a tendency for them to have more wounds.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most horses had a positive general attitude, which agrees with previous studies on the attitude of working equids towards humans [13,18]. Those horses reported with a negative general attitude were more likely to have neglected hooves and there was a tendency for them to have more wounds.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This is the process of abandoning the horse and terminating all feeding and husbandry obligations. Pritchard et al [13] stated that euthanasia of working equines is rarely an option in LMIC due to cultural attitudes, a lack of trained personnel, a lack of availability of appropriate methods and financial reasons, resulting in abandonment and a prolonged, painful death. It is likely that owners "let their horses go" when these horses are old and in poor condition at the end of their working life and they may ultimately starve to death or be fatally struck by vehicles while wandering near major roads.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Donkeys and mules have been associated with poverty and low status for many hundreds of years (3) and are commonly the draft animals of choice for people working in brick kilns. Working donkeys in brick kilns have had many decades of resource provision, though long-term sustainable improvements to working donkey welfare has been largely unsuccessful (4) and policy makers rarely recognize their socio-economic and cultural value (5)(6)(7).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In low income communities, the owner´s livelihood is limited by factors such as poverty, low status and limited access to resources. Therefore, working horses enhance capital and secure sustainable livelihoods [48]. In central Ethiopia, where horses are used as cart taxis, the loss of working horses restricted business and signified a major economic crisis for the local community [49].…”
Section: Socioeconomic Impact Of Working Horsesmentioning
confidence: 99%