2014
DOI: 10.1075/dujal.3.2.03sto
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving word prediction for augmentative communication by using idiolects and sociolects

Abstract: Word prediction, or predictive editing, has a long history as a tool for augmentative and assistive communication. Improvements in the state-of-the-art can still be achieved, for instance by training personalized statistical language models. We developed the word prediction system Soothsayer. The main innovation of Soothsayer is that it not only uses idiolects, the language of one individual person, as training data, but also sociolects, the language of the social circle around that person. We use Twitter for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(23 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the use of computational stylometric cues to detect deceit relies on various theoretical hypotheses commonly accepted by the community, such as the Reality Monitoring framework (e.g., Bond and Lee, 2005), or the Interpersonal Deception Theory combined with the Self-Presentation Perspective (e.g., Hancock et al, 2004). And as highlighted previously, the rationale behind stylometry is the one of the idiolect-baseline hypothesis, which has been supported by numerous studies (e.g., Barlow, 2013;Daelemans, 2013;Johnson and Wright, 2017;Kestemont, 2014;Stoop and van den Bosch, 2014;van Halteren et al, 2005;Wright, 2017). We thus argue that the theories underlying the use of the stylometric methodologies have generally been accepted by the scientific community.…”
Section: Could Stylometry Be Used On the Field To Detect Deceit?supporting
confidence: 64%
“…Moreover, the use of computational stylometric cues to detect deceit relies on various theoretical hypotheses commonly accepted by the community, such as the Reality Monitoring framework (e.g., Bond and Lee, 2005), or the Interpersonal Deception Theory combined with the Self-Presentation Perspective (e.g., Hancock et al, 2004). And as highlighted previously, the rationale behind stylometry is the one of the idiolect-baseline hypothesis, which has been supported by numerous studies (e.g., Barlow, 2013;Daelemans, 2013;Johnson and Wright, 2017;Kestemont, 2014;Stoop and van den Bosch, 2014;van Halteren et al, 2005;Wright, 2017). We thus argue that the theories underlying the use of the stylometric methodologies have generally been accepted by the scientific community.…”
Section: Could Stylometry Be Used On the Field To Detect Deceit?supporting
confidence: 64%
“…The word selection is done with a single click or with keyboard shortcuts. For example, the Soothsayer completion prototype [15] works with the space key, while the text editor of the Presage prediction engine [2] requires the mouse or the F1 to F6 keys to select the predicted words. The ACAT user interface [3] can display the word list both horizontally and vertically.…”
Section: Word Prediction and Aacmentioning
confidence: 99%