2019
DOI: 10.5194/esd-10-789-2019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving weather and climate predictions by training of supermodels

Abstract: Recent studies demonstrate that weather and climate predictions potentially improve by dynamically combining different models into a so-called "supermodel". Here, we focus on the weighted supermodel -the supermodel's time derivative is a weighted superposition of the time derivatives of the imperfect models, referred to as weighted supermodeling. A crucial step is to train the weights of the supermodel on the basis of historical observations. Here, we apply two different training methods to a supermodel of up … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
63
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The imperfect models and the observations might be in different phases, resulting in a converse sign of the synchronization error e. Interestingly, it is still possible to obtain converged weights in this case, only that the weights differ substantially from those obtained with more nudging towards the observations. In the first experiment of Schevenhoven et al (2019) the weights for temperature, vorticity and divergence all turned out to be around 0.3 for imperfect model 1 and 0.7 for imperfect model 2. We apply the same amount of nudging to the same imperfect models, except that the observations are available every second time step, instead of every time step.…”
Section: Adaptation To the Nudgingmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The imperfect models and the observations might be in different phases, resulting in a converse sign of the synchronization error e. Interestingly, it is still possible to obtain converged weights in this case, only that the weights differ substantially from those obtained with more nudging towards the observations. In the first experiment of Schevenhoven et al (2019) the weights for temperature, vorticity and divergence all turned out to be around 0.3 for imperfect model 1 and 0.7 for imperfect model 2. We apply the same amount of nudging to the same imperfect models, except that the observations are available every second time step, instead of every time step.…”
Section: Adaptation To the Nudgingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The obtained weights will not be perfect and possibly not as optimal as weights obtained with a cost function minimization approach. On the other hand, the results in Schevenhoven et al (2019) show that the models are on short term linear enough to let the CPT approach work well. Moreover, CPT is a very fast method, and only few iterations are necessary as compared to the common approach of minimization of a cost function.…”
Section: The Rationale Behind Cpt: An Illustrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations